User talk:Shadow4dark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for preventing agenda pushing and keeping Wiki more neutral Liesbeth98 (talk) 00:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism at Turkish-Kurdish conflict articles[edit]

The IP editor is continuing to conduct his POV vandalism at all three articles and thus I have requested that all three articles be temporarily semi-protected. See here. The request is pending at the moment. EkoGraf (talk) 20:04, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added one more articleShadow4dark (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template PKK-Turkish Conflict[edit]

Hi Shadow4dark, I wonder why you reverted me. We actually already have a template Template:Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present) for the time and if we make it even with an unlimited timeframe, it will become even larger. What are your thoughts?Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did it because the infobox had attacks from TAX wich is not PKK. If you want revert me back you need remove all non PKK events.Shadow4dark (talk) 23:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh, got your point. I do not want to revert "you" back in this case. Just bring some sense to the template, just as I guess you wanted to bring too. Ok, I'll do the edits. If ou agree great, if not, do not hesitate in contacting me. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Konli17: @Paradise Chronicle: again.... Shadow4dark (talk) 21:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gala1900 return, AKA Masitara[edit]

New account and IP user, evasive edits at Operations Claw-Eagle and Tiger - Gala1900 return?? Mr.User200 (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC) likely.Shadow4dark (talk) 03:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tell Abyad is under community sanctions[edit]

Please read this notification carefully; it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

I am trying to ensure that all participants in the recent editing of Tell Abyad have been formally alerted. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

igdir[edit]

hi, i found you undo my last edition in igdir article which was according to sources. Can you say me what was wrong? thanks a lotعلی مکریانی (talk) 11:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your source was about the Iğdır Province Shadow4dark (talk) 11:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

== Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disputed Quotes at Tell Abyad.The discussion is about the topic Tell Abyad. Thank you. ==

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi Shadow4dark. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2020-08-17. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 06:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an RFC?[edit]

Did you request an RfC? I haven't seen any about Tell Abyad. See here. I have requested help at the NPOV noticeboard. EdJohnston mentioned he'd be willing to close an RfC. Lets wait some more days...I also hope for a solution. I think if we open to discussions at different noticeboards, it might get confusing. You could request dispute solution under a different pretext at another Noticeboard, but I don't know if this might prolong the dispute.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:16, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We better wait first yes. Shadow4dark (talk) 18:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation.[edit]

Hello, just checking some articles noticed same edit patern and behaviour in this 3 users. Shubuhat Anon Vandal Ömer Nasuhi Bilmen. Possibly they are the same person and even could be Gala19000. Do you know how to request a SPI. I have evidence.Mr.User200 (talk) 01:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.User200: Yes likely look here i suspected this early. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Paradise_Chronicle#Hi_you_fighting_against_socks Should i start SP on Gala19000 or on ip. Shubuhat is older. And look this [[1]] Shadow4dark (talk) 12:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Wich page did i break this rule? Shadow4dark (talk) 14:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't say you broke anything. Doug Weller talk 14:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Insurgency[edit]

I am not sure if we talk about the same conflict. There is an insurgence, but here is also a political conflict. Both conflicts are somehow intertwined as most politicians get accused of supporting an "organization" and it is mainly thought to be the PKK. But it is not named the PKK, so there is a doubt, which organization they are talking about. Maybe it is the UNICEF they are talking about. Who knows? I suggest, you to create a PKK-Turkey conflict article or I'll create it.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We have also this page Kurdish rebellions in Turkey Shadow4dark (talk) 00:33, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Sock Return.[edit]

Seems that he have returned.[2]. But most likely is not Gala19000, but RamdonUser sock.Mr.User200 (talk) 13:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi Shadow4dark. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2020-09-26. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 06:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Konli17[edit]

I thought I remove the Peacetowikied (he is blocked) edit just beside the Konli edit, sorry and thanks.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible return of SP[edit]

Possible Gala or Ramdom123567 SP?? Here.Mr.User200 (talk) 13:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Gala, his next edits should be watched.Shadow4dark (talk) 13:23, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SOck return.[edit]

Ramdon User return very likely as a Anon IP here and here. Care to Keep an eye.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi Shadow4dark. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 09:06, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naming of the “Iraqi civil war (2014–2017)” article[edit]

I believe Iraq–ISIL War or War in Iraq (2013–2017) are much better so we should change it back to either, 0 references call the conflict a civil war and the name change to “iraqi civil war (2014–2017)” happened in mid-late 2014 when the conflict escalated before everyone knew what type of conflict it was, which makes the name outdated. Ehoah88880 (talk) 17:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“Iraqi Civil War (2014–2017)”[edit]

Now that we saw most people supporting the name “War in Iraq (2013–2017)” can you please close the discussion and move the article? Thanks. Ehoah88880 (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is clossed after 7 days. Shadow4dark (talk) 15:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It’s been well over 7 days now. Ehoah88880 (talk) 13:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you just read my mind LOL[edit]

Well done on opening that move discussion. I was just getting ready to do that. And I forgot to thank you for helping me bust that long running sockpuppet. I couldn't have done it without you. Thepharoah17 (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding some of your diffs, which have been listed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Kurds. The thread is Advice re: would we need a new admin?. Thank you. Levivich harass/hound 17:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep an eye on this article.[edit]

Disruptive editing at Saudi–Yemen barrier, a paragrpah of text and its sources some more reliable than other is being errased and replaced with a unsourced statetment.Mr.User200 (talk) 18:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess only Turks know the Turkish Land Forces.[edit]

Hi, I've told you this before. Hisar-U and S-400 belong to the land forces. Look at Aselsan's website. But unfortunately you are fighting us.

Firstly, Heron cannot be used with weapon.

Secondly, Kaplan tank / armored vehicle consists of two versions, such as Tulpar. Turreted tank, turretless armored vehicle.

Oh and Aksungur is not a tank, edit. Ata Barış (talk) 16:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Someone is reverting your edits[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to say that there is a person called InellectualThinker who is reverting your edits and also vandalizing other pages related to Turkey, can you take an eye please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.184.124.114 (talk) 14:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kurds case[edit]

Hi, I hope everything is going fine with you. I am not sure whether you are following the Case, but GPinkerton has added here a large number of alleged edits of yours that they are claiming these are problematic. The Evidence period has just been extended until Feb. 8 to give people time to respond. I know you didn't want to waste your time on this but I am afraid we have already been dragged into that mud swamp. Cheers, Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 18:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Mustafa Kemal Atatürk[edit]

Hello, I saw you undone the my edit on the page about Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Not important his other brothers/sisters? But Makbule Atadan important? I do not think so.Ata Barış (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because she has own wiki page.Shadow4dark (talk) 18:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is important. Pages about to them can be edited. There was a source. You did not necessary to delete this information (?)Ata Barış (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also not necessary to add them there. You can just add "Makbule Atadan and 3 others" Shadow4dark (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extra information is no problem. People look here for learn and you don't necessary to delete anything sourced. Nonsense to delete just because they don't have their own pages.Ata Barış (talk) 19:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:HakurSakur[edit]

I have a job for you as well: does this user come out of nowhere, or is there someone whom it might be. Drmies (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: this user is new and starts immediately RfC which is odd. But if i look his edit summary it is similair to RandomAccount1235423 and Gala19000. If they change content they refer to talk page but there is no consensus, but their tone looks me to above socks. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019%E2%80%932020_Western_Libya_campaign&diff=prev&oldid=933960365 or https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019%E2%80%932020_Western_Libya_campaign&diff=prev&oldid=980451598 Shadow4dark (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. Yeah, one of two--I don't know what to do with that. I mean, I could run a whole bunch of checks to see which of the two it might be, but I don't know if that's worth the trouble. You might could file a new SPI for the one you think is the best match, indicate that they've already been blocked, but that it's worth categorizing them properly--if you think that's worth it. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 15:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr.User200: wich one should we file this SP User:HakurSakur? He is probably one of these users above Shadow4dark (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forum for Democracy[edit]

Hello, I've started a discussion here about reducing the ideology section in the infobox. If you're interested I'd appreciate it if you can join. Vacant0 (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts[edit]

As noted in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shadow4dark, it looks like you're using multiple accounts. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry to make sure you understand our policies about this. Continued use of sock accounts will lead to you being blocked. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TFX page grammatical concern.[edit]

Hey, I've seen your latest edit "It will enter in service in 2030s". I'm not a native speaker but I think something like "TF-X is expected to be delivered in 2030s" or "TF-X will go into service in 2030s" would be better. I can't really make a perfect sentence neither so I just wanted to show you my ideas. I looked at some examples and "into" is used alot.

Another topic: I've watched a recent interview of Ismail Demir and he said that they expect TFX to go into service 4 or 5 years after first flight date wich is around 2029/2030. I'm thinking about giving an exact date like 2029 or 2030 instead of 2030s, with sources. ŞeyhMuşmula (talk) 00:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Some baklava for you![edit]

Good contributor Cengizsogutlu (talk) 02:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kullanıcı İsmi disruptive edits[edit]

Hello Shadow4dark, I hope you are doing well. I wanted to point out some recent, potentially disruptive, editing by editor Kullanıcı İsmi who you seemed to have had experience in the past. Namely, the editor in question added a separation line into the infoboxes of almost four dozen Syrian civil war battle articles so to separate the al-Nusra Front from other rebel groups. As per established parameters, the separation line is reserved for those who are fighting against the same enemy, but are not fighting as allies. These groups fought side-by-side as allies during the battles. Furthermore, Kullanıcı İsmi went as far as to remove sourced content and its sources (such as BBC News) in a few of the articles as well without any explanation. He seems to have done this in the past as well. He marked almost all of his edits as minor, which they are not. I think an eye should be kept on Kullanıcı İsmi's behavior and action considered if it continues. He seems to have been blocked three times already in just one month since starting to edit, but apparently to no effect. In any case, your help on resolving the issue in a way that would be beneficial to all if possible would be greatly appreciated. Cheers and have a great day! EkoGraf (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems the editor has been indefinitely blocked and the issue resolved. EkoGraf (talk) 20:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update on topic ban violation[edit]

Informing you that cengizsogutlu has resumed editing, and violating his topic ban. - Kevo327 (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking[edit]

On 20 September you linked the name “Australia” to the article about Australia. To avoid the disadvantages of excessive linking in articles we avoid linking to a number of common words that will be well-known to readers. The names of countries is one example of a family of words that we don’t link in articles. Please see MOS:OVERLINK. Dolphin (t) 13:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdistan Workers' Party edit[edit]

Hello Shadow4dark - noticed your edit, I just wanted to ask whether this was added as per one of the sources before. Rather than reverting in case I am missing it. Might be better to provide reference? --TataofTata (talk) 16:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See ref 6, only Öcalan claims these new pkk ideology. Also do you know that these dispute tag was added by sock puppet konli17.Shadow4dark (talk) 17:23, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Shadow4dark: Thanks, it might be good to distinguish which citation you're referring to. Also I looked at source (ref 6) which refers to this pdf
page 16: "Notwithstanding their distinct roots, the last decade has seen greater ideological convergence between the PKK and the political parties; both have adopted the tenets of Abdullah Öcalan’s philosophy. Öcalan had already begun to move away from the objective of an independent united Kurdistan by 1993, when he tentatively put forward compromise proposals in favour of autonomy within Turkey. The PKK’s objectives have not simply been reconfigured since Öcalan’s imprisonment, albeit as late as 2000 he still made reference to obtaining a state (Akkaya/Jongerden 2011: 145). Öcalan used his trials as platforms to communicate an elaborate, all-encompassing system of societal organisation and selfgovernance..."
To me this does not describe a denial, but as stated a compromise and aligning of said objective from the PKK itself. --TataofTata (talk) 13:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thanks for this maybe it should be changed to "disputed by Öcalan" Shadow4dark (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PKK Page[edit]

I got a notification that my post was removed from wikipedia about the PKK, however I added a source and also I tried adding other sources several times, however all of them were blacklisted. Could you point out to me how I was wrong I my post? K123sunni (talk) 04:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source Shadow4dark (talk) 07:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey[edit]

You reverted my edit on Turkey as though it were vandalism. It was not. In a section talking about the name of the country and how the official English spelling it is being changed to avoid an association with the bird, the fact that the bird is in fact named for the country is relevant. Lexicon (talk) 23:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you actually only reverted the editing of the reference to add the source name. Lexicon (talk) 23:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was a misclick because rollback is used against vandalism and not for good faith edits. Republic of Turkiye is now in bold on first line. Shadow4dark (talk) 23:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Code Orange (political party)[edit]

why did you revert me there? what is the problem there? Gooduserdude (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it is wrong add at least source. Shadow4dark (talk) 15:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

VVD move[edit]

It was requested at Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests (check through the history). Befor eI did the move, I googled both titles and found that VVD indeed have more hits. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks, i should had look your history Shadow4dark (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Amiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

Administrator changes

  • added
  • readded
  • removed

Interface administrator changes

CheckUser changes

Oversight changes

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Insurgency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa[edit]

By falsely accusing me of "blanking" you are not only using misleading edit summary but also assuming bad faith against my editing.

There is no consensus to include this false claim. Consider self-revert for yourself. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I don't see a consensus for removing a claim backed by multiple sources. You should go to reliable sources board to ban these sources. Shadow4dark (talk) 17:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Read WP:IRS and familiarize yourself with what constitutes a reliable source.
Where is the consensus for including it? The spurious claim was added without consensus, it was removed, then it is being added without consensus again.
So again, where do you see consensus for inclusion in the first place? Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a consensus for removal. But should we not discuss this on WP:RSN and get consensus for not using Indian and Pakistani sources on unconfirmed claims in conflicts? Shadow4dark (talk) 18:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
the last comment is changing the consensus but these sources need be discussed tot future claims Shadow4dark (talk) 18:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

The new editor User:Politics of Maharashtra is has same vandalised attitude as User: Shivsena Office Dadar and has vandalised pages Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) & Balasahebanchi Shiv Sena So I request to block this editor to stop him from vandalising further He had joined after 2 days of block of User: Shivsena Office Dadar and may be sockpuppet of User: Shivsena Office Dadar He is sockpuppet of used term Sonia Sena[1] used by User: Shivsena Office Dadar and did the same vandalised edits as him Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of newspapers in Turkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AKP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gulen Movement[edit]

All the citations in deleted content are Turkish gov owned or Erdogan family owned newspapers, Anadolu Agency, Hurriyet ,Daily Sabah ever one of them. None of them are free media. If you accuse someone with terrorism you need have evidence to support that . You cannot say "prove that you are not a terrorist" , you have to show the proof if you accuse someone with terror, not Gulen supporters. Until you can show evidence please do not re-add the deleted content.

Hakikatco (talk) 04:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hurriyet was independent sources in the past also you deleting non Erdogan sources Shadow4dark (talk) 10:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For your investigations of sockpuppetry shenanigans that was making life difficult for many fellow Wikipedians. Your diligence helps keep so much pointless crap away from the project.

Keep up the good work! Peter Isotalo 09:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

added Novem Linguae
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

ThanksU|En waarom, beste Shadow4dark zouden dit test edits? zijn? Lotje (talk) 10:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Er was veel informatie verwijderd en het lijkt op een oudere vrrsie. Waarom zijn ze verwijderd? Shadow4dark (talk) 10:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ik verwijder geen informatie uit artikels, tenzij ik natuurlijk een (grove) onvergeeflijke fout zou gemaakt hebben. Ik voeg een cite web sjabloon toe aan de meest recente versie. Jammer dat het artikel in Het Parool enkel toegankelijk is voor abonnees. Konden ze er toch tenminste voor zorgen dat de de titel volledig leesbaar is (vind ik). Cheers. Lotje (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert 2[edit]

Hello! I am confused by your revert here as it is lacking an edit summary. Are you able to explain why you reverted Starship.paint's edit, please and thank you? SQLQuery Me! 23:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The first one was unnecessary edit as it was his personal page and we should leave that alone. Second his page can be edited if they use sockpuppet. Shadow4dark (talk) 07:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's his personal page but the information is obsolete. Paradise Chronicle is banned from their own talk page. They cannot reply to queries, they cannot be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses. Those notices are misleading and will waste editor time and effort if any editor tries to contact Paradise Chronicle and no answer is forthcoming. starship.paint (exalt) 07:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but the arbitration left the page as current version. But it don't bother me if you revert me, you are right about it and is misleading because they can't talk with them as they have no talkpage access. Shadow4dark (talk) 11:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright after I posted this, I finally understood what you mean, use a sockpuppet. Alright, fine. Not going to argue, not going to revert. starship.paint (exalt) 07:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
if you read the case they are busted with sockpupty in past and it will not surprise me if they do this again. If they do it will be blanked anyway. Shadow4dark (talk) 11:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef
readded Tamzin
removed Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

added Pppery
removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism and reverting edits without reason[edit]

Hi i want to contact you about user named LLC226699 which is editing in List of equipment of the Turkish Land Forces. I warned him/her ,but he/she continued to make changes either without citing the source or citing not reliable source. Also doesnt stop reverting my reverts too. No any explanation or anything about his edits or reverts whatsoever. IR-TheFirstSoldier (talk) 18:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of "Category: Racially motivated violence in Africa" from Ethnic violence in South Sudan"?[edit]

Hello, why was this edit done?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ethnic_violence_in_South_Sudan&diff=prev&oldid=1195145050

It's not like "Racially motivated violence in Africa" is that full category (it has ... like 5 articles there) and it doesn't really make sense (when is it ethnical and when racial conflict?)... but then let's just delete the category and all articles? - Running 10:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted blocked sockpuppet. Feel free to add them back if it was correct. Shadow4dark (talk) 10:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I agree that it's a weird category and probably some kind of sockpuppet, fits the pattern here - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Timoy3456/Archive - so I'll instead remove the entire category and all articles there. Or maybe just think really hard what should even be there - Running 13:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stumbled across your revert and had some questions[edit]

Moin! You reverted an edit by an IP user on Kemal Pir which labelled him as a torture victim.

Considering the disgusting inhumane actions by Esat Oktay Yıldıran at Diyarbakir prison, which even his wiki page states he was known for torturing Kurds and PKK-aligned Kurds, why would you remove the edit on Kemal Pir’s page? Volkish Kurden (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a blocked sock user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Timoy3456/Archive#Timoy3456 Shadow4dark (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see, would you say I have the go ahead to revert back to that edit, or better yet add it myself? Volkish Kurden (talk) 14:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can add it back by self. Shadow4dark (talk) 14:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you! Volkish Kurden (talk) 23:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1127045488
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shadow4dark&oldid=1216724257"