Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/August/6

August 6[edit]

Cat:Northland, New Zealand geography stubs → Cat:Northland Region geography stubs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename

Pending outcome of Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_August_5#Category:Northland.2C_New_Zealand. The plan is that if this is successfully changed, over the next few weeks all of New Zealand's regional categories will be renamed in the same way. Grutness...wha? 00:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, assuming the related CfD proposal goes forward; for same reasons given there. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 02:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
late Support Waacstats (talk) 09:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

{{Pakistan-food-stub}} --> {{Pakistan-cuisine-stub}} (redirect)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was 'deleted'. Start from scratch. –xeno^talk 01:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Change to the proper format for cuisine stubs, 'cuisine' rather than 'food' - AKeen (talk) 05:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this needs major work it looks more like a category than a template, support renaming and clean up. Waacstats (talk) 09:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template seems to have no transclusions. Recommend delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.