Wikipedia:Featured article review/Wesley Clark/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC) [1].
Wesley Clark[edit]
- Notified: Staxringold, WikiProject Biography/Politics and government, WikiProject Military history, WikiProject NATO, WikiProject Politics, WikiProject Chicago, WikiProject Illinois, WikiProject Vietnam, WikiProject University of Oxford, WikiProject United States, WikiProject United States presidential elections, WikiProject GLAM/Pritzker Military Museum & Library, 2021-12-21
Review section[edit]
I am nominating this featured article for review because the article does not contain much post-2008 information on this person. There's also uncited statements (not good for a BLP), unreliable sources such as a blogspot and DailyKos, short sections that should be expanded upon or merged together, and a very large 2004 presidential campaign section which I believe can be trimmed (Note: both the 2007 version that passed FAC and the 2022 version are 9 paragraphs long, but I still think it can be and should be trimmed per WP:SUMMARY) Z1720 (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The issues identified are sufficient to delist unless resolved. Cinderella157 (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Cinderella157: During the review process, editors usually vote either to move the nomination to FARC (Featured article removal candidates) or to keep it here as long as improvement is done. 'Keep' or 'Delist' is voted during the FARC process. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no edits to address issues (t · c) buidhe 09:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC; no progress. There are many low-quality sources, and the reference formatting is problematic as well. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC; besides the above-noted sourcing issues we're citing " Google search results containing real estate listings for Wesley Clark Blvd in Madison, Alabama." and a LinkedIn page. Hog Farm Talk 14:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section[edit]
- Issues raised in the review section include currency, sourcing and organization. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no significant improvement (t · c) buidhe 06:28, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist substantial sourcing issues have not been addressed. Hog Farm Talk 15:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist – the problems identified above still remain. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.