User talk:Zakkerone

John B[edit]

The version of the article that I deleted consisted of: "hes the fucking man lol"!

I have e-mailed you a copy of the earlier version. The only independent evidence in the article was a link to geer-online which is now broken. Feel free to prepare a draft text in User:Zakkerone/sandbox making sure that you include evidence of notability and then raise the matter at deletion review. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I included the missing information and independent references for restoring mostly the page. And now i'm working on new page to add the photos, wide discography and more facts. The draft is prepared at User:Zakkerone/sandbox. — Zakkerone (talk · contribs) 11:53, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One can only wonder at someone who is incapable of copying a proper wikilink from one point to a point a few lines away. Why did you use external format to link to your sandbox when I had already given you the correct markup? Similarly this edit not only contained an external link which should have been a wikilink, it was also in the wrong place - no-one involved in DRV would ever have seen it. Now, read my message again and see if you can work out what you are supposed to do. (Sorry about the heavy sarcasm but I think you deserve it.) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"I didn't reply in time" (in your e-mail). If you leave it a month to reply, that is fine but it is a good idea to use a {{talkback}} tag. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roger, i see you are clever man and you do a lot for wiki. But. Being wise is the synonym of being kind. to newbies, to types of knowledge, to somebody's mistakes. It seems you know nothing about electronic music, articles not appears from nowhere in most cases, there are people, story, time, efforts, achievements behind it. i love wiki, i love knowledge and i love the sense of respect to another knowledge. You showered me with your heavy sarcasm and i deserve it, but i think it is not worth of time to be spent instead of simply restoring the page, which should be restored by you initially from the moment somebody spoiled it. — User:Zakkerone/sandbox. — Zakkerone (talk · contribs) 19:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you wonder that I am sarcastic and newbie-biting. You were told a month ago to go to deletion review and you still have not done so. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I beg your pardon for this, i posted request at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_October_8 — Zakkerone (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

there are some changes at John_B Zakkerone (talk) 05:48, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]