User talk:Wiki142B

May 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm MrOllie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Aquaponics seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 23:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please mention which sections did not seem neutral so i can adjust it please, I added quite a lot of details into my edit and they were about many different people. Wiki142B (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All of them. Your writing is full of value-laden wording: examples include 'significant', 'pioneering', 'visionaries', 'significant strides', and so on. Please don't remove just those words and put the edits back - those are examples. You need to get familiar with how things are done on Wikipedia. WP:NPOV and WP:NOR are core policies here. MrOllie (talk) 00:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Integrated Aqua-Vegeculture System, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The material I added is 100% open source and copyright free and I also asked permission from one of the authors. ~~~~ Wiki142B (talk) 21:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edits I added were removed due to copyright concern, but they are in fact not coyright and when I tried to restore what was deleted the page is removed and there is nothing left in the delete log? Is this normal? Wiki142B (talk) 21:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The place where I found the matching content is here. I was able to download a copy of the article from ResearchGate and it is a 1993 journal article. There's no evidence that this article is free of copyright. In fact, open licenseing such as Creative Commons did not yet exist in 1993. If the copyright holders with to release the article under a compatible license, we need to have documentation that shows the copyright holders. Wikipedia has procedures in place for this purpose. Please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. (We can't take your word for it that someone has given you permission to post it here.)

The revisions containing the copyright material were hidden from view under under criterion RD1 of the revision deletion policy, and that's why you can't access them any more. — Diannaa (talk) 02:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is incorrect.

When you view the full content from Wiley you can see that the first 2 pages are the ONLY pages that contain the article journal and were taken from pages 331 and 332 of the journal. If you skip forward to page 428 there is an copy of the actual paper, as written in the journal where it says: "Full scientific article from which this summary was written begins on page 428 of this issue."

The copy at Researchgate was uploaded by one of the authors and is a direct photocopy of the paper as it was published in the journal, that is why it contains mention of the journal at the bottom of the pages on the researchgate link, but. most importantly, it does not contain ANY journal article or original content and it should not be removed.

In summary, the paper itself is a total of 5 pages long. The content on Researchgate is 5 pages in total. The content on Wiley has an additional 2 pages, the extra 2 pages on Wiley are the journal article and those 2 pages were not added to this wikipedia page. .

IAVS and all it's research has been made open source and therefore copyright free and was advertised on the website that is run by one of the authors you can see at https://iavs.info/tale-a-tour/

I will contact the author and ask to have a cc license added, if this is not needed, please let me know.

. Wiki142B (talk) 04:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Open source' is absolutely NOT the same thing as 'copyright free'. And even if the text in question is copyright free - it must be added in a way that properly credits the author(s). MrOllie (talk) 11:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you. Wiki142B (talk) 22:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please do contact the author(s) and have them send us an email releasing the material to the public domain or under license. Please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. — Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, thanks for the advice. Wiki142B (talk) 22:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]