Jump to content

User talk:Theblacklarl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There are many people who try to post lies on my page due to the fact that I am a true libertarian. I follow the old ways of libertarianism and have not sucummed to the new homosexual waves of new members. I will stay loyal to the old gaurd. Stay away from my page you fools. Liberty will rule once again. DickClarkMises constantly is stalking me! He is clearly a loser without any friends! (unsigned post by User:Theblacklarl)

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Theblacklarl, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!


PS: Regarding your addition to Lew Rockwell. I can't find where the SPLC has called him racist or anti-semitic. We need to have a source for an assertion like that. Let's wait to add it back until we've found one. Thanks, -Willmcw 04:52, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Warnings[edit]

Note: Remember to always substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | kate's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

November 2005[edit]

  1. Many consider Rockwell an anti-semite... If "many" believe this then we shold be able to find at least one notable critic who has said so. Have yuo read it anywhere? Please know that Wikipedia:Verifiability is one of the wikipedia:five pillars (see above for other important guidance). Cheers, -Willmcw 06:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

December 2005[edit]

  1. An article looks weak when editors use superlatives without citing verifiable examples. Please bear that in mind when making further additions to articles. David D. (Talk) 18:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Removing data from articles: Please stop vandalizing various articles, including Walter Block, Lew Rockwell, and others. I can point you in the direction of verifying sources to demonstrate that Block is indeed a Canadian citizen. Please work towards consensus, rather than unilaterally changing things that strike you as undesirable. I have worked with Walter quite recently (Fall 2005), and I can assure you that I am not attempting to defame him in any way. Please discuss any controversial edits you make on the appropriate talk page. Dick Clark 18:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -Willmcw 18:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Please don't delete warnings from your talk page. Regarding your sources for Block, peronsal knowledge is not enough. We have to have verifiable sources. -Willmcw 06:16, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Please stop putties lies around wikipedia, specifically on my talk page. It is rude and inconsiderate. (unsigned comment by user:Theblacklarl, originally inserted at User:DickClarkMises)
  6. Please do not insert unsourced information into articles. Also, please do not blank others' user pages or user talk pages. I have not posted any "lies" about you or anything else. I would welcome your input if you can demonstrate (via the appropriate citation) that any of my edits are factually inaccurate. Dick Clark 17:18, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I must say that you are nothing if not persistent. You have now inserted insulting comments into my user page (not my talk page) 5 times in the last 24 hours. Very impressive. Dick Clark 17:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Regarding User:Mailer diablo: Please do not blank people's user pages to send messages to them, add a new item on the users talk page User_talk:Mailer diablo by selecting the "+" sign next to the edit button. Also please be aware of the wikipedia policy WP:NPA calling people fags on your talk page would be considered a personal attack and is inappropriate. If you continue you could be blocked from editing Thanks --pgk(talk) 17:21, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:DickClarkMises: Please do not make personal attacks on other contributors. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on the contributor. For further help, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Thank you. Owen× 17:24, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Owen× 17:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Own I promise you, you have the facts wrong. I am putting truthful information which is being removed by DickClarkMises. He has constantly antagonized me by criticizing me constantly on my own talk page. Please make sure he stops! Thanks in advance —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theblacklarl (talkcontribs)
    Any user is perfectly allowed to criticize you on your Talk page. However, if you continue to post attacks on his User page (not Talk page), it is you who will be blocked. Owen× 17:32, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see anything here which is a personal attack against you. if there are incorrect claims here, leave them and post a response. And please sign your comments using ~~~~. Thank you. Owen× 17:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    No, it's not "your own" page. It is a Wikipedia page intended for communicating with you. Please observe our policy and guidelines regarding talk pages. See WP:TALK for details. Owen× 18:00, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    This user is a liar and a cheater. He basically goes around Wikipedia making up lies about other users. You can't delete this- I was given permission from Wikipedia administration to criticize you for your lies. You are your socialist buddy Willmcw are liars and cheaters. You know nothing of libertarianism or its leaders. I never claimed to be Walter Block, my name is Sean Christopher Marinara and I have said that before and I say it with pride. (unsigned post by User:Theblacklarl)
    No, you did not get any permission to launch personal attacks against other users. I said you can respond to criticism, but your post here is a violation of WP:ATTACK. Theblacklarl, this is your final warning. Owen× 18:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Libertarianism: As you can all see, the user DickClarkMises has made numerous comments regarding me. I will not insult him here because I do not want to be kicked off of Wikipedia. Please just know that I see things very differently from him. Again, my name is Sean Christopher Marinara and I am a college student at Holy Cross. Dr. Block used to teach here, and I learned about him through that. My friends and I are all libertarians. We have personal information about Dr. Block that we learned from his former colleagues here at Holy Cross. When I tried to post this information, some users, including DickClark, deleted it. The information is 100% true. I ask that you please carefully consider the situation before making any decisions which might be considered rash.
    Personally-obtained information is not allowed on Wikipedia. It violates our prohibition on original research Wikipedia:no original research. Everything must be verifiable from other sources. Regardless of that matter, your behavior has been disruptive. Please stop posting notes on user pages - only use talk pages for that. I suggest reading wikipedia:five pillars for an overview of the approach that editors need to have here. -Willmcw 18:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Truth and verifiability: It's not enough that the information is true, it has to be independently verifiable. Check WP:V for details. Owen× 18:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Sean C. Marinara:: This is me.... Notice how so many people criticize me here? They don't even know what libertarianism is (unsigned by User talk:Theblacklarl).
    What does that have to do with your editing? Do you have any verifiable sources or do we just have to take your word for it. I think you can see that the latter is problematic. David D. (Talk) 20:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Not helpful: It's pretty clear that you spend the majority of your time on this website. That said, you don't have the right to constantly string insults at people who don't know how the website works as well as you do. It's rude and unkind. I can say italian ITALIAN Italian or however I want to and you have no business saying anything about it. Really, you're ridiculous. I ask that you stay away from my posts and my discussion page. 20:32, 19 December 2005 (UTC)~TheBlackLarl
    Proudly signed by TheBlackLarl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theblacklarl (talkcontribs)
  13. Theblacklarl,
    1. User talk:DickClarkMises is not your discussion page, as you claim.
    2. I will not stay away from any discussion page, yours or otherwise. When you rudely accuse someone of being ignorant and prejudiced, you will hear from me, and from other admins.
    3. Please sign your posts using ~~~~. Your username is Theblacklarl; there is currently no registered user called TheBlackLarl, as you can clearly see. If you wish your username to be changed to the latter, please place a request on Wikipedia:Changing username.
    4. I don't see how it is any of your business what I spend my time on. I suggest you concern yourself with your own life, rather than mine.
  14. Thank you, Owen× 21:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

January 2006[edit]

  1. Wikipedia:be civil. Do not call your fellow editors liars. -Will Beback 01:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree. As someone once said "There are many liars out there...many people...who are rude and unfriendly." Please don't be one of them. David D. (Talk) 01:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. This message is yet another personal attack. Please stop this. Also, please understand that nobody "owns" any article, and everybody is free to edit any article. --Rob 10:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Walter Block: Theblacklarl: Could you please cite a notable source verifying that "Professor Block is noted among Columbia University's most distinguished alumni"? I agree with you that he is among the most distinguished alumni (MN Rothbard graduated from Columbia also, btw), but we need an appropriate source to make such a claim on wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Dick Clark 22:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have been blocked from editing for one month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for personal attacks, incivility, the use of a misleading signature link, introduction of false and/or unverifiable information, removing information from articles, removing warnings from your talk page, and for claiming to have special dispensation for personal attacks from Wikipedia's administrators. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to do so after the block expires. // Pathoschild 05:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clean slate[edit]

arl -- I have decided to give you a clean slate. You're coming back to Wikipedia tomorrow and it's time for you to behave properly here. With this clean slate, I expect you to follow the rules of Wikipedia. No more vandalism. No more being uncivil. Show respect to your fellow editors and you may become one in time. Many people who were once kicked off come back and lead proper lives here at Wiki, and we're hoping you will too. Now go on, edit properly, and enjoy what the Wikipedia has to offer!!! 140.247.43.84 Wellington

Sockpuppet[edit]

Would you mind telling everyone we're not the same person? Quite frankly I don't see any similarity between your posts and my own but everyone seems to think I'm you, you're me and vise versa both ways. Name's "GreatBarrington" Accusors are DaycD and others (unsigned comment by User:GreatBarrington)