User talk:Radufan~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Radufan~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 23:31, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This might interest you[edit]

Seeing that you're a new Romanian Wikipedian, I thought this could be a handy link for you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

It's a portal for the Romanian community here, where one can discuss new Romania-related articles, communicate with other Romanian users and work together on different projects. One can also engage in discussions about whatever you please on the talk page. Anclation 18:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EU[edit]

Hey, I saw your "This usewr trusts the European Union about as far as he can throw it" and I totally agree with you. The problem is, somebody's trying to delete it...If it won't get deletd, can you let me use it ? Many thanks... -Voievod 18:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian minority in Romania[edit]

Hello Radufan, I have been working hard recently to upgrade the Hungarian minority in Romania, to make it more NPOV. I guess just like everyone I would like to get rid of that POV tag as soon as possible, as the tag suggests that the article is not worth reading. Since you were the person that got disputed over the neutrality I would like you to point out the disputes you have, so we can talk about them. Could you please do that on the Hungarian minority in Romania talk page?

I must say that the article in its quest to be more NPOV got a bit of a pro-Romanian sense. I have put my findings out of the literature I read in the article so it got a more neutral stance. But I think it's not enough. The article reads like the Hungarians didn't have it so bad in Romania after all. Fact is that in every study I read about this (for instance the case-study by Benett Kovrig (see the article) and The Hungarian minority's situation in Ceausescu's Romania (1994) by Andrew Ludanyi) there is more emphasis on the really bad situation they enjoyed under the agressive nationalist policies of Ceausescu. To be short, in my opinion the article runs danger to become a Romanian POV article. Kind Regards, Maartenvdbent 16:18, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roma people won![edit]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Roma people was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Romanians[edit]

Salut. Te-am contactat pt avem serioase probleme la articolul wikipedian despre Romanians. Dupa cum vezi, user-ii Jayig si administratorul SlimVirgin au pus cele mai joase cifre posibile. Cand am incercat sa intervin, punand numerele adevarate, am fost blocat pt "vanadalism", asa trebuie ca toti wikipedistii Romani sa facem ceva. Daca te intereseaza si vrei sa te alaturi, da-mi un email sau scrie pe pagina talk Romanians. Numai bine, NorbertArthur 2 Aprilie 2006

Proposed Georgia Move[edit]

As a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested_Move_-_July_2006. Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus. --Vengeful Cynic 03:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vino la pagina de discutii Transnistria[edit]

În 17 septembrie va fi referendum în Transnistria legat de independenţa regiunii. Cu această ocazie probabil multă lume va căuta pe Wikipedia informaţii despre Transnistria. Am încercat să adaug în articol nişte informaţii legate de acest referendum, anume:

- faptul că mai multe organizaţii antiseparatiste au lansat un apel la boicotare, considerînd referendumul "farsă"

- faptul că din 46 de ţări membre ale Consiliului Europei, 45 sînt împotriva recunoaşterii referendumului, numai RUsia are altă părere

- faptul că datele Comisiei Electorale Centrale din Tiraspol au fost schimbate în mod ciudat, anume numărul total de alegători s-a micşorat cu 7% faţă de 2005, ceea ce ridică suspiciuni asupra unei încercări de creştere artificială a prezenţei la vot prin raportarea unui număr mai mic de alegători înregistraţi.

Totdeauna am dat lincurile care dovedesc cele scrise de mine, n-am născocit nimic din burtă.

Userul Willian Mauco, care pare fan Tiraspol, mereu mi-a şters adăugirile. (vezi istoria paginii)

Puteţi vedea la pagina de discuţii Transnistria ce argumente a adus. Anume: ăia care cer boicotarea referendumului din Transnistria sînt foşti KGB-işti, că aşa zice o organizaţie rusească de analiză (a dat un linc pentru asta). Întîi a spus că respectivii nici nu sînt din Transnistria, ci doar din Basarabia, dar i-am dovedit că unii dintre semnatarii apelului la boicot sînt transnistreni. Am fost împăciuitor, i-am zis că n-are decît să adauge părerea organizaţiei ruseşti că antiseparatiştii sînt foşti KGBişti, că n-are decît să-i considere pe cei care vor boicotarea referendumului drept băieţi răi, dar faptul în sine, că s-a cerut boicotarea referendumului, trebuie menţionat. Degeaba, mereu mi s-au şters adăugirile - pentru celelalte 2 fapte nici n-a adus argumente.

A mai fost o adăugire care a şters-o, despre arestarea a 4 persoane din Transnistria care sînt împotriva separatismului (între timp li s-a dat drumul). În cazul ăsta am renunţat eu să mai insist pentru includerea informaţiei în articol (deşi informaţia e incontestabilă), tocmai fiindcă n-am vrut să mă cert prea mult.

În perioada asta cînd agenţiile de ştiri vor menţiona referendumul de la Tiraspol, se va citi articolul Transnistria în Wikipedia poate mai mult decît într-un an întreg. De aia acum e nevoie să existe în articol informaţii despre contestarea corectitudinii referendumului. Nu cer să se menţioneze ca adevăr absolut faptul că referendumul e incorect, ci doar că există unii (OSCE, 45 din 46 ţări ale Consiliului Europei, unele organizaţii din zonă şi din Basarabia) care consideră asta. Vă cer de aceea sprijinul ca să interveniţi pe pagina de discuţii Transnistria pentru a susţine rămînerea informaţiei în pagină şi să repuneţi informaţia atunci cînd Mauco o şterge (eu nu pot să verific chiar 24 de ore din 24). Evitaţi atacurile suburbane, păstraţi ton civilizat. mulţumesc.

Who is William Mauco Here is an article about a Wikipedia celebrity, William Mauco, and his relations with the International Council for Democratic Institutions and State Sovereignty (ICDISS), an organisation "which seems to be a front organisation for a Kremlin-backed rogue statelet called Transdniestria" (quote from the article) http://0.bypass-filter.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2Vkd2FyZGx1Y2FzLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8yMDA2LzA4L2dvdGNoYS0yLmh0bWw%3D

Edward Lucas wrote about Mauco: "The other lead is William Mauco. He has an extensive record of posting intelligent and fairly neutral entries on Wikipedia, not only about TD but about other unrecognised statelets. Crucially, these predate ICDISS's birthday of January 2006. And he also claims to have been at their conference in Mexico City in April of this year. I have written to him asking to get in touch, and had a friendly email in reply. I am planning to follow up this research in an article in European Voice at the end of August, so watch this space!"--MariusM 08:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Votaţi împotriva cenzurii[edit]

Împreună cu EvilAlex (un tip din Tighina - Transnistria) am creat un articolul Heaven of Transnistria despre propaganda regimului de la Tiraspol. I s-a cerut ştergerea. Vă rog ajutaţi-ne să păstrăm articolul, votînd contra ştergerii [1]. Destul a fost şters din articolul principal Transnistria, Wikipedia e plină de propagandă a Tiraspolului, să avem măcar un articol care explică această propagandă--MariusM 20:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ro.Wiki recruitment[edit]

Hello Radufan, I noticed your appeal on the Romanian Noticeboard’s talk page and I must say it’s very positive that someone is trying to inform the community about the situation on ro.wiki, and how they can help. May I however suggest that you move the appeal from the talk page to the front page (my impression is that few people check out the talk page these). I doubt it could justifiably be considered off-topic, seeing that ro.wiki is part of the larger Wikiepedia project and certainly relevant to the users on this particular noticeboard.

By the way, I know that the Romanian Wikipedia is collaborating with various sites and groups, but has any effort been made to promote our Wiki on the larger Romanian web forums? I don’t mean promotion in terms of spamming random topic on popular forums, but rather as in getting in touch with forum administrators, explaining the project and finding out whether they’d be willing to themselves promote the Romanian Wikipedia in any way. I believe this could prove very useful, as several Romanian forums have a huge number of active users, users that are (most probably in contrast to the majority of inept anonymous users that we have to deal with) by and large internet-savy and know how to function and interact in a wider online community. Of course, many would not initially be familar with the way a Wikipedia works, but by employing the various help pages we have at our disposal, informing such users shouldn’t prove too difficult. Please respond on my talk page with your take on my idea, thanks. - Anclation 17:16, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of David Talbott[edit]

I have nominated David Talbott, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Talbott (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 17:15, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Bulibasa.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bulibasa.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bulibasa.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bulibasa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stelian Popescu[edit]

According to ER's license, I can copy the work provided it's attributed. So if I were to write "This article incorporates information from the equivalent article on Enciclopedia României", that would be in keeping with the license, would it not? - Biruitorul ^Talk 17:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, you didn't answer my question. Second, just name those articles and I'll address the issue. - Biruitorul ^Talk 20:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely zero of the Gigurtu article is taken from ER - Iulian Toader isn't the only person to have access to those books. I'll fix Universul.

While I'm not a lawyer, the license seems quite clear: ER articles can be copied if they're attributed. In fact, your license is rather similar to Wikipedia's (which has countless mirrors). Why have a Creative Commons license at all if you're going to complain about people using your stuff? Might as well go the "© 2009 Enciclopedia României, All Rights Reserved" route. - Biruitorul ^Talk 20:38, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I get the message: no ER material on Wikipedia. Fine. As far as I can recall, Universul and Popescu are the only instances of that. Popescu is already "fixed", and Universul will follow shortly (unless you want to speed things up yourself). - Biruitorul ^Talk 20:53, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia[edit]

Bună! I've been working to set up the WikiProject Dacia to organize better the articles about Dacia and improve their quality. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Maybe you find it interesting and wish to join. Thanks and best regards! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania[edit]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Talbott for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Talbott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Talbott (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IRWolfie- (talk) 19:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Radufan. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Radufan~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of David Talbott for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Talbott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Talbott (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 23:05, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

17:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)