User talk:Paul Archuleta

August 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rudra have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rudra was changed by Paul Archuleta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864058 on 2021-08-02T01:49:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Bart D. Ehrman. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Bart D. Ehrman. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rudra. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:08, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kali have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kali was changed by Paul Archuleta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853723 on 2021-08-08T14:47:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:47, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kali (demon). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kali (demon) was changed by Paul Archuleta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96382 on 2021-08-08T14:50:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Krishna, you may be blocked from editing. WikiLinuz (talk) 04:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Seems like they haven't changed their disruptive behaviour; see this and this. WikiLinuz (talk) 04:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 15:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]