User talk:Patrick.N.L

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kingdom of Aksum into Himyarite Kingdom. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mount Ebal curse tablet

Hello, Patrick.N.L. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mount Ebal curse tablet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mount Ebal curse tablet

Hello, Patrick.N.L. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mount Ebal curse tablet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring

You have previously been notified of the sanctions in place for Arab-Israeli conflict topics. If you continue edit-warring I will be reporting you and asking you be banned from editing material in the topic area. nableezy - 17:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Why are you reverting correctly sourced topics and keeping numbers which are now proven to be false by independent investigations. I thought the rules was no more than one revert per 24 hours, has it changed? Patrick.N.L (talk) 22:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Because the sources do not say what you are claiming, and they have specifically refuted the highly tendentious portrayal you are presenting. And because the talk page showed a consensus of users agreeing your changes were inappropriate. Edit-warring can happen no matter how long you space out your reverts, and if you continue to revert without a consensus you will be reported. nableezy - 22:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

They have not refuted anything. They have just said 10k bodies have not been identified, so let's keep incorrect numbers.

The article says that the casualties are as follow :

7,797 children, 4,959 women, 1,924 elderly, and 10,006 men

"There's about another 10,000 plus bodies who still have to be fully identified, and so then the details of those - which of those are children, which of those are women - that will be re-established once the full identification process is complete," Haq told reporters in New York.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/un-says-gaza-death-toll-still-over-35000-not-all-bodies-identified-2024-05-13/

But then you go forward and put lies, like that the number of children casualties in Gaza surpass 9000. How is that accurate when current report says that the latest confirmed number is 7 797 children casualties? Patrick.N.L (talk) 19:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

No, that is not what the article says, the article says of the bodies that have been fully identified those are the numbers. It does not say the total number of children killed is 7797, and that remains completely false. I dont intend to engage with you further here, but any more edit-warring, or personal attacks like you go forward and put lies, will be reported to WP:AE. Toodles, nableezy - 21:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)