User talk:Nickrent

Welcome!

Hello, Nickrent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Curtis Clark 20:22, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rafflesiaceae[edit]

Thanks for cleaning up Rafflesiaceae. I feel a bit bad about that one, in the sense that I knew the article lurched between sensu lata and sensu stricta with only the briefest of explanation, but I didn't really try to fix it. You did far better than I could have, however. It is really nice to see someone contributing here who can write about taxonomy in a coherent way (in particular, including relevant morphology and explaining why the classifications are being made, not just listing circumscriptions from a database). Kingdon 05:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

It's nice to see another editor taking a rigorous systematic approach to botany-related articles. You will find that many of the articles need major work. If you have any problems, questions or comments related to the articles themselves, feel free to post them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants where many of the other botanical editors hang out. MrDarwin 15:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orobanchaceae question[edit]

I realize you asked these questions on Wikipedia:Help desk, but responding here seems easier. First, "The first is the genus Centranthera that, for some reason, links to a page on orchids. This is not correct and it should not point to that page." I couldn't find any reason given in the wikipedia edit summaries, but a google search for "Centranthera orchid" shows what happened - there was an 1842 publication under this name for the genus which should be called Pleurothallis. If there is a need to distinguish between the orchid Centranthera, and the Orobanchaceae one, one way is with an author citation (botany). I've added the rest of the details to Centranthera, so see there for more details. (For how the redirect worked, and how I changed it from a redirect to an article, see Wikipedia:Redirect).

Second, "The second problem is with the genus Melasma. This also refers to a skin condition. So, it needs a disambiguation, with the plant version of the word pointing to the correct page." First of all, some google searching shows that the skin condition is by far the most common use of the word. So the skin condition should stay at Melasma. The plant should probably be Malasma (plant) (although I don't know if we have a rule about naming it that way versus Malasma (genus) versus others you might see). The top of the Melasma page should generally point to the plant, probably via:

although there are a lot of templates for this and I'm not 100% sure which one to use here. There is no need for a Melasma (disambiguation) until there are more than two meanings for the word. This is the trickiest of the situations you mention. There aren't a lot of steps involved, but each one involves a judgment call and it isn't always clear-cut.

Third, "The genus Striga also goes to a disambiguation page, but maybe could point directly to the plant page". Do this with a piped link.

Oh, and a nitpick (not to a question you asked, just a suggestion). When a species or genus is moved from one family to another, it is generally helpful to say this in the article (maybe with a cite to the paper that moved it or some other suitable reference). Otherwise readers (and future wikipedia editors) will see other sources give a different family and not know which one to believe (for example, which one is new, which one is old, and whether a new name is based on solid evidence or whether it is one of those rearrangements which gets proposed but never catches on).

Anyway, thanks for working on these pages and I hope that these wikipedia complexities aren't too confusing. If you respond here, I'll look at it (for the near future at least), or feel free to leave a note on my talk page if there is anything I can help with. Another good place to ask plant questions is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants. Kingdon 02:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not directly edit the article about yourself[edit]

Hello, Nickrent. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 11:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]