User talk:Luna Caoimhe

February 2022[edit]

Hello, LunaValoäa, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. My other account is 'WoomyLuma', which now remains permanently unused. I created a new one because I wanted to change my name, so the old account will no longer be used. Apologies and thank you! LunaValoäa (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is an option for a name change while preserving account history, see WP:RENAME. It may be a better option for you. Otherwise, got it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question thats not related to wikipedia[edit]

are you this youtuber? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaptianKharisma (talk • contribs) 18:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is me. LunaValoäa (talk) 20:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Lesan moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Marc Lesan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - thank you for the note. I merely translated the page from its Catalan page. I rarely write a page myself, and usually just translate. Now, if the suitability varies between languages of Wikipedia, I was not aware of this, but I will keep it in mind in the future - thanks again. LunaValoäa (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marc Lesan[edit]

Hello, LunaValoäa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marc Lesan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, LunaValoäa! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! —Sirdog (talk) 11:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comarques of Catalonia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Noguera, Garrigues and Terra Alta. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of At Dead of Night for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article At Dead of Night is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/At Dead of Night until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietCicada (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vilaller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PSC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extremadura placenames[edit]

Hi! Putting WP:VER issues aside, Extremaduran language placenames are not endonyms for most places in Extremadura.--Asqueladd (talk) 08:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erm... how come? Some municipalities had the name already, I only added it to the missing ones (same with Fala and Portuguese). Regarding verifiability, I used a manual of local toponymy which I will try to reference in the future (used by Extremaduran Wikipedia too) – but same thing, some municipalities didn't have it either. Even if they aren't endonyms for all places, I feel like it's important to include in some at least, much like Aragonese, Basque, Occitan, Catalan and Arpitan feature in many pages for communes that don't speak the language anymore or for whom it's just a nearby language. I can vaguely understand the big cities, but for the rest, I don't really see the reason. Thanks for your time, though. LunaValoäa (talk) 12:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If such languages are not local languages I don't see why their placenames should be included in most contexts (let alone the opening statements). Same can be said for any language, let alone if the existence of a given xenonym is barely verifiable. Additional features about this language in particular (which doesn't change the essence of the former) include its ortography seemingly being barely standarised to begin with... Sorry if I accidentally reverted some specific case in which a placename were actually an endonym, although we would be still talking about unsourced edits.--Asqueladd (talk) 12:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen anything like this with all the other municipalities I've added regional language names to, but, how should it even be sourced? Just the name of the ortography manual? LunaValoäa (talk) 13:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that there are handbooks about shuch things (placenames), non-user-generated reputed encyclopedias, as well as actual secondary sources dealing about toponymics or the place itself available for many languages. I am not aware if that's the case with the Extremaduran language corpus, which seems to be scarce to say the least. Needless to say, the possible existence of such sources does not turn Extremaduran into a local language.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]