User talk:Kkm5848

Welcome!

Hello, Kkm5848, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! John Vandenberg 22:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring using the sockpuppets (or meatpuppets) User:Akx256 and User:Brownwalrus. Both of those accounts are indefinitely blocked. Evidence may be found at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kkm5848. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may appeal by placing the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on your talk page. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kkm5848 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What evidence is there of sockpuppetry? Just because you don't agree with my views doesn't mean I am engaging in sockpuppetry. Akx256 and brownwalrus are two different users who happen to share the same POV -- that the article on HSC should be factually correct and balanced!

Decline reason:

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kkm5848 is the evidence, and I agree with the closing assessment by Akhilleus. Daniel Bryant 08:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked[edit]

Hi. You've been blocked for edit warring on Hindu Students Council. The block's duration is 24 hours. – Steel 23:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the Witzel letter[edit]

i'm don't know what you mean by this edit summary[1] but i take it u've read my reply to ur comment on that article's talk page. need i say that the edit summary is not an adequate response for the concerns raised there? Doldrums 14:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael E. J. Witzel[edit]

Kkm5848, if you continue to add tendentious material to Michael E. J. Witzel, you may be prevented from doing so again. Wikipedia is not the place to pursue vendettas against living people. Please review WP:BLP and WP:NPOV. Thank you.Proabivouac 04:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]