Mystery of the creation of universe[edit]

Universe
	The Hubble Ultra-Deep Field image shows some of the most remote galaxies visible with present technology, each consisting of billions of stars. (Apparent image area about 1/79 that of a full moon)
Age (within Lambda-CDM model)	13.799 ± 0.021 billion years
Diameter	At least 156–554 billion light-years (47.8–170 billion parsecs) (or infinite)
Mass (ordinary matter)	At least 1053 kg
Average density	4.5 x 10−31 g/cm3
Average temperature	2.72548 K
Main Contents	Ordinary (baryonic) matter (4.9%); Dark matter (26.8%); Dark energy (68.3%)
Shape	Flat with only a 0.4% margin of error

the creation of whole universe is not an easy chore for any human beings because the creation of universe is the multi super nominal activities it is endless topic endless formation of body and the endless formation of universe. We are inside the close system of universe so we can easily define that close system. here you have to know a theory that's called the “theory of false”.

Theory of false.[edit]

This theory is very discerning and the interesting one because this theory never be characterized before Thus the concept of this theory is firstly elucidate in this articles. Friends now I am very thrilling to tell you about the realism of This theory. the “theory of false” is the cause of the creation of universe,

That is based on the

mass Consciousness theory.[edit]

Mass is directly proportional to stability when the mass of any
object increase then the stability of object also increase.
As an example when you go to build the house then you have
to give it proper foundation which is the compositions of iron
rods stone sand which forms a strong pillar.
But it only 4 certain depth then after the earth provides it to a
long range support which is made up of soil than water layers.
And then it will be baseless after the end of Earth diameter
but what happened ? Is it the building fall or fixed?
As we all know that the building is fixed because their base
provide the necessary stability of that buildings that's the same
things it happens in the formation of universe or any planet.

Demonstration[edit]

Both theories are the cause of the creation of universe.
"theory of false”
means The formation of anybody on the
false base.
“Every truth is based on a smart false. So a smart false is better
than a idiot truth.”
“every truth of humans is based on a smart false of
nature.”

The three symbolic representation is very important here
…………………….. -1, 0, + 1……..………………
In the above representation. The -1 is the false base 0 is the
transitional state and the +1 is the physical truth.
As you all know theory that the energy is neither be created nor
be destroyed here you can know that the mass is also neither be
created nor be destroyed it only transfer from one form to another.
The whole Cosmos is formed from the false Cosmos
But the formation of Cosmos is unidirectional means a positive
and a physical Cosmos can not be converted into a false Cosmos
But a false Cosmos can be converted into a physical Cosmos.
But here I am not sure, that is not be Transferable
because in many Hindus scripture.

Hindus scripture[edit]

it was mentioned that  the

things can be disappeared and on the many occasion
Lord Rama and Krishna
Performed such art to disappear many physical object so may be
it can be transfer but I'm not sure how it can be transferred.
Every particles try to decrease their surface area, air, water any
Or any physical body in this world trying to decrease their surface
area to attain their maximum stability.
Which generate an invisible net force. As we all knows that we
are not Standing on the earth rather than we are hanging on earth.
It's a topic of experiment that we are hanging from the Earth
or standing on the earth if we are stand on the earth
then the cause of gravitation is earth
because the net invisible force Of Earth is more than the net
invisible force of universe but if we are hanging on the Earth
then the cause of gravitation is universe and the net Invisible
force due to the universe is more than the net invisible force of Earth.
as we all know that The gravitational force of Earth is zero at the

* Centre Of Earth[edit]

g=o At the centre of earth not only due to Earth,
but it is also due to the centre of close system.
Every open system want to be closed means earth is a closed
system due to its atmosphere each and every planet is a closed
system due to its true atmosphere or a false atmosphere and the
universe is also a close system but only for it its Constituent body
which situated inside that universe but a universe is to be
a closed system due to its false atmosphere.
No one system is fully closed and the no one system is fully
open because each and every open system to be close after
a certain range and each and every closed system can be
open by applying a certain amount of force.
as we all know the science is divided into 3 part first one is the
Physics chemistry and Biology, but it is very interesting to know
which comes first on the earth physics a physical world chemistry
chemical world or a biology a biological world.
Then the answer of this question can also be found by utilising the

“theory of false”[edit]

In the theory of false the every new creation of

a particle that is starting from the false particle.
means nothing's come first only the false particle comes first
when you go to know the cause of the creation of Physics or
the physical world.
then you have to remind the theory of false
“minus one zero and plus one”
false physics, inter physics, and the real physics this is the way
of creation of every unique particle.
In the Hindu scripture a period of time was described that's
called Kṛta Yuga in which it was a time period in which
to perform any work people not have to do the physical work it .
it is complete imagination based work In that time people don't
have to do anything they need only to think about anythings.
And it is automatically be transferred into to result.
yeah you can obviously think that, this is baseless
theories and such things never be happened.
but when you think about the visibility of body. then you easily
be found that the result is transformed into visibility.

what's the people can see?

here the answer is,
the result of work is visible in this world .
the everything around you, is only and only the result of any work.
that you can see through your eyes.
which is Only based on your sense organs, But as you know
your sense organs is not so much developed that you can
see every and every presence of things which is existing around
you. Every sense organs of living beings have some limitation but
your mind have the power to understand and realise the fact
that your sense organs is not enough smart to know the truth.
We not have to go to waste time to know about the limitations
of eyes nose ear tongue or skin That's we already know.
Then we must have need to accept The truth which was realised
in past. otherwise we have to invest so much more time to know
all that's fact which already been realised by someone in past.
because the today is based on yesterday and that tomorrow will
based on today. every present need to take resource from past
to run fast. so the concept of Kutty Yug is not a baseless theory.
maybe the definition of work (“work= force×displacement”)
Have some limitation or applicable for certain condition.
maybe it is not a Universal formula.
you also have to think through this viewpoint .
as you all know that in imagination we must have to invest
energy to think about anything’s but the displacement is not
possible there.
but how we can calculate work of study work of love work of
imagination we all know that is also a types of work but the
calculation is not possible there by applying the above formula
because the above
formula is only for the calculation of physical work but work
may be physical or virtual.
We can rewrite the above formula

Draft:Change the Game concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Change the Game, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aeconix[edit]

Hello Gullgate,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aeconix for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Vexations (talk) 18:49, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aeconix[edit]

Hello Gullgate,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aeconix for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Vexations (talk) 21:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

It is not entirely clear what this is supposed to be. It is partly incomprehensible poetry masquerading as scientific discussion, and partly about the Union Government of India. It has no references. A Wikipedia article should be about one topic, and should be comprehensible.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gullgate/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Gullgate/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gullgate! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Barghoriya[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Barghoriya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.brandbharat.com/english/bihar/districts/madhubani/Madhubani_PANDAUL_Biraul_Barghoriya.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gullgate/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Gullgate. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Gullgate/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:44, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Hubble sees galaxies galore". spacetelescope.org. Retrieved April 30, 2017.
^ Cite error: The named reference Planck 2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ "MSU researcher recognized for discoveries about universe". December 21, 2004. Retrieved February 8, 2011.
^ Itzhak Bars; John Terning (2009). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time. Springer. pp. 27ff. ISBN 978-0-387-77637-8. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
^ SPACE.com – Universe Measured: We're 156 Billion Light-years Wide!
^ Cite error: The named reference Brian Greene 2011 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Paul Davies (2006). The Goldilocks Enigma. First Mariner Books. p. 43ff. ISBN 978-0-618-59226-5. Retrieved July 1, 2013.
^ NASA/WMAP Science Team (January 24, 2014). "Universe 101: What is the Universe Made Of?". NASA. Retrieved February 17, 2015.
^ Fixsen, D. J. (2009). "The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background". The Astrophysical Journal. 707 (2): 916–920. arXiv:0911.1955. Bibcode:2009ApJ...707..916F. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916.
^ Cite error: The named reference planck2013parameters was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ NASA/WMAP Science Team (January 24, 2014). "Universe 101: Will the Universe expand forever?". NASA. Retrieved April 16, 2015.

[spacetelescope.org-1] "Hubble sees galaxies galore". spacetelescope.org. Retrieved April 30, 2017.

[Planck_2015-2] Cite error: The named reference Planck 2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[msu-3] "MSU researcher recognized for discoveries about universe". December 21, 2004. Retrieved February 8, 2011.

[Extra-Dimensions-4] Itzhak Bars; John Terning (2009). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time. Springer. pp. 27ff. ISBN 978-0-387-77637-8. Retrieved May 1, 2011.

[spacedotcom156-5] SPACE.com – Universe Measured: We're 156 Billion Light-years Wide!

[Brian_Greene_2011-6] Cite error: The named reference Brian Greene 2011 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Paul_Davies_2006_43-7] Paul Davies (2006). The Goldilocks Enigma. First Mariner Books. p. 43ff. ISBN 978-0-618-59226-5. Retrieved July 1, 2013.

[wmap_universe_made_of-8] NASA/WMAP Science Team (January 24, 2014). "Universe 101: What is the Universe Made Of?". NASA. Retrieved February 17, 2015.

[Fixsen-9] Fixsen, D. J. (2009). "The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background". The Astrophysical Journal. 707 (2): 916–920. arXiv:0911.1955. Bibcode:2009ApJ...707..916F. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916.

[planck2013parameters-10] Cite error: The named reference planck2013parameters was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[11] NASA/WMAP Science Team (January 24, 2014). "Universe 101: Will the Universe expand forever?". NASA. Retrieved April 16, 2015.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

The Hubble Ultra-Deep Field image shows some of the most remote galaxies visible with present technology, each consisting of billions of stars. (Apparent image area about 1/79 that of a full moon)^[1]
Age (within Lambda-CDM model)	13.799 ± 0.021 billion years^[2]
Diameter	At least 156–554 billion light-years (47.8–170 billion parsecs)^[3]^[4]^[5] (or infinite^[6])
Mass (ordinary matter)	At least 10⁵³ kg^[7]
Average density	4.5 x 10⁻³¹ g/cm³^[8]
Average temperature	2.72548 K^[9]
Main Contents	Ordinary (baryonic) matter (4.9%) Dark matter (26.8%) Dark energy (68.3%)^[10]
Shape	Flat with only a 0.4% margin of error^[11]