User talk:Energon

Nafpaktos

User Energon, you expressed doubts in the past about the inclusion of Nafpactos in the wider urban region of Patras. I must admit that there are grounds for believing this, however a recent paper by professor Vassilis Pappas ERSA conference, concludes that : "Today, and according to the extents of built space and all natures of flows and networks in this, the wider urban complex tends to include and the Municipalities of Rion, Antirrion and Navpactos. The relation of interdependence Patras – Rion is undeniable. The other two Municipalities, Antirrion and Navpactos present to-day a relative lifting of pre-existed "withholding of" contacts, because the cost (time and eco-nomic) of passing the canal via ferries, but not in the expected rhythms. Resent unofficial meas-urements show that the increase of vehicles traffics, via the bridge, has been increased in a per-centage of 20–25%. Undeniably and in any case, Patras constitutes a first degree centre of ser-vices for the three other Municipalities, as well as for the entire region of Western Greece". Because the topic may seem debatable, I would like you to elaborate more on the arguments against this suggestion, so that we could amicably conclude about the appropriate reference. As I lack specialist knowledge on the subject of urban science, I can only infer through such kind of sources. --Conudrum 15:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Diplomatic Missions by Country (DMBC)

Energon,

I notice that you are listing different countries' honorary consulates in Greece (and only Greece). For DMBC we have chosen not to list honorary consulates, as many countries have a huge and frequently changing number of honorary consuls. Please cease and desist from adding honorary consulates. Thank you. Kransky (talk) 05:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I am not aware of this policy. Could you please indicate where is this decided and by whom enforced? Moreover, when a user is editing a specific article (any article), where does he find this kind of information concerning policies and decisions (for that article)? Energon (talk) 08:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Apollon patron.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Apollon patron.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Port sailing.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Port sailing.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Achaia cities Patras suburbs.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)