User talk:Bugghost

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

testing testing[edit]

is this thing on Bugghost🎤:🐛👻 17:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bugghost. I have closed the discussion that you created. While I understand that there seems to be content issues involving another user, it isn't a good idea to create a discussion with the username of a person as the header. Additionally, as mentioned at DISPUTE, "Try to avoid discussing conduct issues on article talk pages." As I mentioned in my edit summary, anyone can revert the closure, including yourself. However, it might be better to discuss the issue with the other user on their talk page or or ask an admin for advice: "However, administrators, or other experienced users, may be willing to informally offer an opinion if you ask them privately (for example, via user talk page)." Since you are a newer user I would recommend that you look at the Talk page guidelines for more understanding about what article talk pages are best for. --Sincerely, Super Goku V (talk) 10:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Super Goku V Hi Super, I appreciate the advice and feedback. I'll leave the topic closed as I don't think there is anything further that needs to be added and I think reopening would fuel further disputes. I'll look into contacting an admin when I get the chance, and will look at the guides you mentioned. Thanks again for the advice 11:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Bugghost🎤:🐛👻 11:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand the notice at the top of the page. You may not edit within the areas it covers, you have nowhere near 500 edits. I realize that you think my actions have been "heavy-handed." Administrators hear that all the time, along with "too patient." In this case, I'm giving you the same benefit of doubt as the edit-warriors I blocked (who both at least had more than 500 edits - I checked). If you breach the editing restrictions again, you will be pageblocked from that talkpage and article. Please take this seriously. Acroterion (talk) 02:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acroterion - I'm taking your feedback on board and will leave the contentious topics alone. The comment that used the phrase "heavy-handed" was largely just to show solidarity to the user because they "took a hit" while attempting to deal with (in my view) a consistently disruptive editor, while also receiving several personal attacks and antagonistic remarks from them. I understand your reasoning behind the pageblock and was not trying to relitigate it or continue any argument about the topic, and with this feedback I'll just leave the whole article and surrounding talk pages alone. As you point out I'm relatively new to wikipedia editing and this has been a learning experience, if a clumsy one. Bugghost🎤:🐛👻 17:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, just trying to keep everybody out of the way of problems. Administrators are used to having all parties be unhappy with outcomes at AN3, it goes with the territory. Since the Eurovision contest is such an odd candidate for sanctions, many editors are not familiar with editing restrictions or the more contentious parts of Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 18:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 02:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Dee Dee Blanchard[edit]

Hi Bugghost, thank you very much for your comments on the Dee Dee Blanchard talk page. Just to explain my rather short edit summary. Normally I would explain more, but with that edit Daniel Case was reintroducing problems that other editors have criticised since 2019. He has been told what's wrong with his edit, he knows what's wrong with his edit, and he refuses to accept it. I strongly believe that there exists no edit summary that would have avoided this response from him. I'm considering applying for a topic ban on him for that article to end this disruption. BoldGnome (talk) 00:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

PicturePerfect666 (talk) 23:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]