User talk:Axedel

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Axedel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Lefcentreright (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thought experiment[edit]

Let's say I allegedly raped a lost duckling in a storm pipe last year. Pretty nasty, eh? Wait, it gets worse. You come along next July, and despite my insistence that we've never met and that pro-duck and anti-duck extremists are both loons of a feather, any editor with a genuine fondness for conscious urban poultry and a financial incentive to make like a common Manhattan pigeon and shit all over you daily could rake you over the coals if this information surfaced online somehow. Why? Because me and you aren't so different, in retrospect and tunnel vision.

Don't disclose anything you wouldn't feel comfortable with your aunt, boss or high-school sweetie knowing, but you've said and done some things to birds (as a kingdom and personally) you'd probably like to forget, correct? Eaten the charred corpses of an entire enslaved and tortured brood of siblings from a tribe widely known among your people for its ease of terrifying? Shot a mother robin as a boy, felt guilty and dedicated the remainder of that "episode" to protecting invasive beings from extermination or defamation at the hands of the majority? Merely ruffled a few feathers on some random turkey, then ran away screaming "It was a prank, bro!", like those social experiments on YouTube.de? Makes no difference, it happened and it's over and we can't go back and I tagged you, Axedel. That much is certain.

But you can relax again, because ducks aren't hot and you're not Trump. And I didn't "rape" that abandoned chick so much as as cup her tender nuggets in the dutiful commission of a slew of lesser offences (impersonating a fireman, interfering with a federal drain, failure to recall an incident). Plus, that's another lie. Knowing how many lies I've spread about bird violation in the short time we've been associated now, do you really believe a bunch of hot-blooded vegan Twitterati are going to trust me when I tell them you're innocent of time travel mind control and devouring the flesh of strangers?

But seriously this time, you're in no danger, real or imagined. Just trying to convey how it must suck to be so flippantly tied to unspeakable acts on such shaky premises, you know? Do unto others as you'd they do you. If you want to horribly mistreat animals to whom you can't afford common human decency, I'll understand, but I'll be damned if I haven't taught you something about empathizing with men and women who are as unconvicted of any wrongdoing as you probably are. Give lying about the dead, lifers and dumb beasts a try, if you need to wean. I believe you're destined for greater things than your recent brushes with libel suggest, and I mean that sincerely. Keep up the good inspiration around here! InedibleHulk (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have Vandalized a Talk page[edit]

Please DO NOT vandalize the talk pages of wikipedia articles based on your personal agendas, and please familiarize yourself with their purpose. Further disruption my result in your editing rights being revokedXoltron (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who vandalized the talk page by adding conjecture and speculation. David O. Johnson (talk) 04:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with the purpose of an article's Talk pages. Among other things, talk pages are for discussing editing-related contentions or potential contentions which may lead to "edit wars".Xoltron (talk) 04:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't lie about your activity. You're a vandal. Axedel (talk) 04:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Axedel, You can't win an argument by being rude and by name calling. Your repeated lack of understanding for the purpose of talk pages is your problem. If you make such a false reference against me again I will make a formal grievance. Xoltron (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember this argument from 18 months ago, but I don't think I was being rude. If I called you a liar and a vandal then I definitely believed you were a liar and a vandal, and you probably still are both of those things. I hope you can move on with your life and find more fruitful things to do than starting fights about nothing with random people. Axedel (talk) 00:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is another warning to stop personal attacks against editors and vandalizing people's talk pages.Xoltron (talk) 21:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The corona virus and the global econmy[edit]

How could the world's population( globally )stand up to prevent a shut down in the blood life of the world economy - commerce Hematopoiesis 16:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

How the hell should I know? Axedel (talk) 19:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 California gubernatorial recall election[edit]

All the candidates listed at 2021 California gubernatorial recall election are sourced at the end of the Declared candidates section.

The official list of candidates is here:

https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Candidates/List.aspx?view=intention&sort=NAME&electid=172&electNav=172 David O. Johnson (talk) 16:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Civility, Vandalizing my talk page[edit]

Please refrain from personal attacks in response to repeated warnings on you against attacks on other editors.Xoltron (talk) 21:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't attacked you or anyone else. You, on the other hand, have said crazy things about me and several other editors. I'm sure you can find websites other than Wikipedia to start fights with random people about nothing. Do that, or better yet, talk to a psychiatrist. Axedel (talk) 02:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentence in your previous comment is an outright personal attack. Please stop making comments such as those. —C.Fred (talk) 02:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I've got no desire to talk to Xoltron. I don't actually know what we're talking about anyway. Axedel (talk) 02:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]