User talk:AgadaUrbanit/Archives/2011/April

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2011

Sorry - I reverted the vandalism on the Isle of Mann page but ended up reverting your reversion of it - fixed now.Jembana (talk) 22:47, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for the link

That was pretty cool. But it does make me miss my Nintendo Famicom. I hope all is well with you too. Though I don't think that is possible if you're still editing I/P articles. So I hope you're keeping your head down at least. See you around. --JGGardiner (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Reply

Reply to this at the article talkpage: [1], not my talkpage. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:17, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

I did here. This was discussed. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 00:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
No you didn't. You said "we have centralized discussion,to avoid edit waring" , but you joined the edit war of two sockpuppets and Cptnono to forcibly remove a map without consensus. Explain this. You didn't reply to where the centralized discussion is where there is consensus that we shouldn't use the map. You also quoted another user "No consensus means no map.", what Wikipedia guideline is that based on? and how is there no consensus for this map? Since you removed the map you should reply to these questions. Also don't post anything at my talkpage, including talkpage notices. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Sorry my edit had rationale, please stop WP:IDHT and edit warring around Golan "location" question. This might appear as WP:TE and it would not change anything in the real world anyways. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 00:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your correction

on my edit. I understand why you undit my edit. I would like to briefly explain to you why i edited this section of the Isle of Man page. I'm studying via the Open University Manchester, T214 course, where it was part of this months Block to edit a page on Wikipedia for a fellow student to critique. I omitted the links to references on purpose to provide the reviewer with some 'ammunition' for his review on my entry.

I will put the entry back in but will attempt to reference it this time. I believe it is an important fact, not well recorded, but very well remembered by the locals.

Trust my explanation gives you better insight to my edit. Certainly no spam intended!

Kind Regards, Jörn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manxie69 (talkcontribs) 05:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Breast shaped hill

Hello! Your submission of Breast shaped hill at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 10:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)