User talk:98Tigerius

Committed identity: c95a739811fb004d63ac532409a62fe88d1b488ecd2ee6761396a60b590c81b0ba0b96c5eb0b9d2232bd45c418630dc425d48ffdb8067d83b9aacf367706384e is a SHA-256 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi 98Tigerius, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

UAAP 86 Awardees

Hi, Von here. Just wanted to mention that I believe the awardees should have their full names as these are official awards, and it has been the precedent in the past pages of the tournament. Otherwise, consistency should be applied, and have the past pages updated to reflect this. Thanks Voncabriga (talk) 06:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Just to add, not having the full name or at least using the nickname mashes the awards seem informal. Some of the nicknames also weren’t mentioned or referenced in the page, and may cause some confusion as to who the awardees are to someone who doesn’t follow the tournament. Just my two cents. Voncabriga (talk) 08:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Just wanted to put that up for discussion and see from your point of view for the edits. I don’t mean to impose my side, will obviously lean more on what the standards are Voncabriga (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

I understand it but I still stand by my reasons on why I undid some of your edits earlier. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Yup that’s fair. Just wanted to understand the other side of it as well. I just lean more on consistency, and formality. Happy to be corrected, of course, if there’s some standards to it. Cheers! Voncabriga (talk) 09:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)