User talk:186.3.232.209

December 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 22:13, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

186.3.232.209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You're making a mistake, I'm not an evasion, I have been editing occasionally here since February, and I saw that that user named Lil Pablo was starting evading in March, I'm not that user. I demand that they unblock me now, or if you don't want to unblock me even you they decrease my block time. But in conclusion, I am not that user. 186.3.232.209 (talk) 18:28, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Every sock puppet says that they aren't one, since that is the whole point- so that doesn't work as an excuse. 331dot (talk) 18:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But 331dot, I have been occasionally editing here since February, please understand me. Please as a Christmas present at least 331dot or Yamla I beg you to decrease my block time, because 10 months is so much, put me like 3 months minimum. Or alternatively unblock me, because I'm not Lil Pablo, I have editing here since February. 186.3.232.209 (talk) 18:48, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Putting a quicker end date on the block doesn't do anything to address the reason for the block. If you aren't evading a block, please request unblock again with a better explanation than "It's not me". 331dot (talk) 19:25, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Better explanation for 331dot

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

186.3.232.209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not evading a block, my edits were made in a different way as Lil Pablo (I saw that Lil Pablo's edits and his socks' were disruptive, I recently heard about of that user, just in case), and also in all these months where I've been editing no user told me that my edits were disruptive (I have only received advises in edit's reasons from users from mistakes I made but that's is normal, everybody makes mistakes), if my edits were disruptive it would mean that I'm Lil Pablo when it's not like that, check my contributions if you want and see what I'm talking about, and you see that it weren't disruptive. 186.3.232.209 (talk) 19:29, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verifies the block is appropriate. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:53, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

186.3.232.209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Jpgordon

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request.

Checkuser is a tool available to a very small group of trusted users like myself.

Most likely jpgordon is indicating that you're editing from the same IP and/or device as the blocked user in question. SQL^{Query Me!} 01:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

: ”Checkuser verifies that the block is appropriate”, what do you mean with that? User 331dot told me that if I'm not an evasion I have to make a better explanation, that I already made, And that is not enough for them to unblock me, what can I do to convince you that I am not evasion? 186.3.232.209 (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)}}

Fixed request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

186.3.232.209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Jpgordon: ”Checkuser verifies that the block is appropriate”, what do you mean with that? User 331dot told me that if I'm not an evasion I have to make a better explanation, that I already made, And that is not enough for them to unblock me, what can I do to convince you that I am not evasion? 186.3.232.209 (talk) 05:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't like to disable talk page access on lengthy blocks that affect logged-in accounts, but there's no point in hearing further appeals from this IP address at the current time. If anyone who is not a sock puppet is later allocated this IP address, please appeal via WP:UTRS. This IP address has been used for block evasion, not necessarily by you and not necessarily by the editor named above – but our technical logs prove that has been used for block evasion. There is no way to argue the opposite. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

---