Jump to content

User talk:132.183.13.81

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Cam Cameron has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Current events/2018 July 21, you may be blocked from editing. (Warning level carried over from User talk:107.77.193.165.) 93 (talk) 03:54, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2019 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Limit. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Limit was changed by 132.183.13.81 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919028 on 2019-07-23T14:34:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Yerpo Eh? 15:35, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Old wives' tale has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Limit. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Limit was changed by 132.183.13.81 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861318 on 2019-08-12T13:23:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 89.240.135.201 (talk) 16:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Filmssssssssssss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.==Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]