Template talk:Disability navbox
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Discussion of this template copied from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disability#template_reactions_by_WP:MED[edit]
High importance and Mid importance are not good classifications and would be high maintenance. Suggest better ones, thanks. Hordaland (talk) 14:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that Importance is not a good way to sort them - I think we could use "themes" such as:
- Rights and law - (Articles about UN conventions, ADA, etc.)
- Social issues - (Articles about Inclusion, Special education, Sport, etc.)
- Medical issues - (Articles about Diseases and conditions that lead to disability)
- Technology - (Articles about wheelchairs, hearing aids, etc.)
- and so on. Roger (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)