Template:Did you know nominations/White House Honey Ale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:58, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

White House Honey Ale[edit]

  • Comment: Two reviews now owed. Review done (though others will follow)

Created/expanded by Violetriga (talk). Self nom at 23:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review for ALT2
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk)


Hook review for ALT3
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk)


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Fine Crisco 1492 (talk)


  • I've just added a photo of President Obama and Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer drinking this beer which might be worth including Nick-D (talk) 10:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Information cited to blogspot should be either removed or given a better citation. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
I would usually agree but that is the closest you can get to an official source and it is used merely to identify the month of launch rather than just the year. violet/riga [talk] 09:35, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Note how "the only beer know ever to have been brewed in the White House." does not have a citation after it, essentially rendering it cited to blogspot. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:44, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
That's one problem with such a cite system - as it is used within a sentence it confuses matters. The first line was referenced later on meaning that this could get away without a cite if it were classed as part of the lead. Anyway, I've reused a cite for clarification. violet/riga [talk] 10:33, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Both ALT2 and ALT3 are okay now. Not especially fond of the original or ALT1. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC)