Template:Admin dashboard

Permanently protected template
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 110
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 56
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 54
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 9
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 132
Requested RD1 redactions 0
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 17
Open sockpuppet investigations 154
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

AfD debates relisted 3 or more times
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Requested RD1 redactions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no drafts
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no portals
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
Wikipedia:Template index/Wikipedia namespace
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 3
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Possibly contested candidates 0
Other candidates 14
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 6 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 190 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Chudachandra

Reason: High level of IP vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4085:8dc9:156d::8189:f40a (talk) 16:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Multi-Party Charter

Temporary protection: repeated deletion of Disputes section by rapidly changing IP. Adakiko (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Generation Alpha

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of unsourced changes by IPs. Some1 (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Kim Woo-jin

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and newly registered persistent removal of WP:NOTCENSORED content. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High risk being issued for OK today, please protect page for at least 48 hours. BryceM2001 (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Yusufzai

Reason: IP users have came into the page for months on end adding random content. My previous request (here) for a long duration ban was ignored because... ? So these are IPs that have been tampering around for months, perhaps approaching half a year of this now. I request a months long duration ban on IP users, the sole source of the article being messed around. High protection isn't needed but atleast some level of protection is, for a long duration of time as this just happens to be one of those articles that need it. This article literally degrades over time when left alone thanks to these IP users. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 12:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Yeh Hai Chahatein

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks from Entertainment4Reality after named accounts blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Liver King

Reason: Frequent BLP vio and unconstructive editing Orchastrattor (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Roti canai

Reason: Persistent disruptive content removal by unregistered user(s). Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Kenosha unrest shooting

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. An IP needs to be blocked for edit warring. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 14:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 128.92.27.115 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Not ruling out protection, but currently watching how it plays out. Favonian (talk) 15:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

List of Sony Pictures Animation productions

Reason: Addition of unsourced content, high level of IP vandalism, and disruptive editing. 216.208.153.194 (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Hook (2022 TV series)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Om Parvat

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Rangiya railway division

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Worcester, England

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7c:8512:5300::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Smalljim. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Shortcuts

Democratic Unionist Party

Reason: Let's try to give it a shot being open. Completely Random Guy (talk) 07:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

I don't know, I'm seeing on the average one or two reverts per week, fairly consistency since the beginning of this year. That tells me that PCP is just creating more work for reviewers and the protection should be changed to semiprotection instead. Removing PCP isn't going to change the workload (except maybe to avoid having to approve the good edits), but at least it's preventing unconstructive edits from becoming visible. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
And I think that pcp may be creating a little more work "behind the scenes", but it also prevents visible disruption in the first place: things simply don't go live. For my part, I am somewhat loath to semi-protect pages which do get not much disruptive traffic, like in this case. After having had my daily read of our protection policy, this is way under the threshold for semi-protection. If an admin wants to semi-protect: be my guest. Lowering protection to none isn't the way to go, though. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done. While I am inclined to replace PCP with semiprotection, based on Lectonar's comment, let's leave it as it is for now. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


ChatGPT

New URL Change from chat.openai.com to chatgpt.com 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

(Not an Admin but...) The main url is chat.openai.com, chatgpt.com redirects you to there. No reason to change it Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
probably an A/B test 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

China

When I click on the article, it still shows a Semi-Protection on it (even though according when I click on "View History" it shows that it is Extended-Confirmed), can someone please fix this? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 14:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Not done – It currently shows the blue "extended confirmed" protection icon. Favonian (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Chef Xavier

Biography Chefxavier (talk) 15:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Not done – Meaningless request. PS: You should avoid writing about yourself. Favonian (talk) 15:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

5 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:List (request) 2024-03-25 20:55 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Wikipedia's sister projects (request) 2024-04-25 14:25 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Wikimedia-globalblocking-ipblocked (request) 2024-05-01 12:11 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Wikimedia-globalblocking-ipblocked-range (request) 2024-05-01 12:11 MediaWiki page (log)
Module:Message box/ombox.css (request) 2024-05-04 15:58 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
10 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox station (request) 2024-04-30 18:15 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:S-reg (request) 2024-05-01 19:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Election box candidate with party link (request) 2024-05-03 00:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Election box turnout (request) 2024-05-03 17:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-05-06 00:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Canadian party colour/name (request) 2024-05-06 07:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Editnotices/Page/Aston Martin DB9 (request) 2024-05-06 13:47 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
Template:TBA (request) 2024-05-06 14:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by El C on 2024-04-28: "High-risk template or module"
Template:Infobox event (request) 2024-05-06 14:33 Template-protected (log) Protected by RenamedUser jaskldjslak901 on 2013-12-17: "Highly visible template"
Module:Multiple image (request) 2024-05-06 15:29 Template-protected (log) Protected by Jackmcbarn on 2014-11-18: "High-risk Lua module"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 12:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:B3251

I am making a request on behalf of myself, as I sometimes create new articles pretty often (mostly New Brunswick-related). As of right now I have 66 live articles, and I have expanded plenty more. I have had a few deletions: two articles when I was brand new to editing & one list I created in mid-2023 (due to not completely understanding WP:BLPCRIME at the time). Otherwise, my articles have been pretty straightforward and vary in quality, with most being Start/C-class by the time I publish them. I had a little bit of a rough start when it came to "notability knowledge", as many do, but overtime I have grown to have an understanding of WP:GNG and WP:MOS when writing articles. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 11:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done I've looked through your last 10 articles. You produce clean articles and nobody comes along and does tidy-up work. The obvious area for improvement is with date formats. Often, you use mdy dates in the prose and you consistently use dmy dates for referencing. Not sure why you do that but it's not a good idea. Settle on one date format and then stick to it. And with regards to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Loblaw boycott, I'm unconcerned about that; the worst that will happen is a merge. Good work! Schwede66 08:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
I agree that I need to get into the habit of adding the "Use mdy dates" templates. The reason why I use dmy in referencing is due to just being used to Wikipedia's automatic dmy-setting retrieve date for referencing. B3251 (talk) 15:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:TheGreatestLuvofAll

I have created at least 25 articles that follow WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG about singers and albums. I am familiar with WP:C, WP:V, and WP:BURDEN in my articles, without copying content without permission, and I make sure my info is sourced in any articles I created. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done There's always a little bit that others have to clean up when you finish with an article. Nothing major: DEFAULTSORT, dashes, categorisation. But to walk away from such a version is just not good enough. It wasn't just tagged for bare URLs but also as an orphan. And when someone came and fixed your bare URLs for you, you removed the bare URLs tag but didn't attend to the referencing mistake that the other editor had introduced. For autopatrolled, articles need to be cleaner. Your editing seems a bit rushed. With a little more care, you could qualify for autopatrolled in no time. As an aside, removing unpleasant messages from your talk archive is not something you should do. Schwede66 09:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Princess of Ara

I recently noticed this user, Princess of Ara. An editor who works mainly on Nigerian related articles and others. While trying to appreciate the user's effort, I got in love with the lovely articles, well sources, written from a volunteer in good faith and now, I am requesting that she be granted the auto patrol user right. It'll also help reduce heavy backlog of NPP. Thanks for your consideration! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Prince of Erebor

I have created 75 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Thatbombayboy

I have made many edits, and I think if I can get permission, I will able to contribute more effectively. Thatbombayboy (talk) 11:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Indefinitely blocked as a sock. Schwede66 08:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:SheriffIsInTown

I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Assem Khidhr

Hi! I'm working on WP:WikiProject AfroCreatives (and the corresponding frWP and arWP projects) as part of an imminent campaign and I was hoping I can expedite the addition of our newly created {{WikiProject AfroCreatives}} into relevant articles. I would keep it to black-and-white situations where articles are in Category:African films, Category:African actors, etc. Otherwise, if there's a dedicated bot for this kind of requests that I'm not aware of, by all means let me know. Assem Khidhr (talk) 01:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot talk 01:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Royalesignature

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights Royalesignature (talk). 04:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC) To enhance my editing skills and making edits easier and faster without compromised qualities for quantities

 Not done Request reason has nothing to do with AWB. -Fastily 21:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:BittersweetParadox

I edit pages often and fix WikiLinks, which this is helpful for. I am an Extended Confirmed User; I'm sure there you can see that, but I just wanted to let you know.

Anyway, I have seen many edits on pages using this tool, and I read up about it and it seems very useful. Thank you! Thomasbeem (talk) 06:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Note: User renamed to "BittersweetParadox". ToadetteEdit! 06:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Boutboul

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights I am a wikipedia contributor since 2006 with more than 600 contribution in French and 357 in English. Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done This will be granted automatically once you meet the 500 edits requirement on the English Wikipedia. Unfortunately, only contributions here count towards the requirement. stwalkerster (talk) 12:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:PharyngealImplosive7

I was granted new page reviewer rights temporarily and I think that I'm ready to get them permanently since I've tagged and patroled over 50 pages now. I've also tagged many pages for deletion that were unfit for the wiki. Finally, I would like to participate in the May backlog drive. I thank the reviewing admin for their time and hope that I will be granted this perm. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 16:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Ingenuity (expires 00:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 16:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

User:SheriffIsInTown

I regularly create pages and want to save others time from reveiwing pages created by me, in addition to that I would be able to help with the backlog. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 00:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

@SheriffIsInTown: To be clear, the NPR permission does not assist with review of your own pages. If you want to "save others time from reviewing pages created by me", then you would want to request autopatrolled at WP:PERM/AP. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I will still want new page reviewers rights so I can possibly help with the backlog. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
@Hey man im josh It would be nice if I can get the rights before the May backlog drive starts so I can participate in it. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 Done for a 2-month trial. Hey man im josh (talk) 03:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Dclemens1971

I have extensive experience with new page creation and expanding stubs into appropriately sourced articles, and I also engage regularly (and constructively!) in AfD debates and PRODs with a good understanding of applicable policies. I'd like to apply this experience by helping out in May with the NPP backlog. Thanks for considering! Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Trlovejoy

Request to participate in the May backlog drive. I have been an editor since 2005. I have knowledge of policies and guidelines. I am a rollbacker and huggle patroller. I have a good record of constructive interaction and moving pages in accordance with guidelines. TRL (talk) 02:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

@Miniapolis or @Spicy or @Clovermoss Hi - I'd like to ask for consideration of this request from last week. Thanks much! TRL (talk) 01:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done as a 1-month trial, since you've only become active recently. All the best,Miniapolis 16:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission new page reviewer. — MusikBot talk 16:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:BluePenguin18

I have been editing for over four years with ~1K live mainspace edits, including some engagement with the deletion processes and significant article creation including BLPs. With no behavioral blocks or 3RR violations and an understanding of the relevant guidelines (including RfC engagement), I am seeking new page reviewer permissions to join the May 2024 backlog drive. Thanks for reviewing this week's burst of requests ahead of the drive! BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 08:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC) BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 08:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

(Removed not done template). Thank you for volunteering, but I'm going to have to deny this for now. If you're interested in re-applying at some point, which I do hope you do, then I encourage you to demonstrate some familiarity with the deletion process and notability guidelines by participating at WP:AFD or WP:AFC. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done @BluePenguin18: I talked with Heymanimjosh about it because I think you're a worthy candidate that can be trusted. You have a good track record in the areas you participate in and have made a good impression on me. So I've granted the NPP perm on a trial basis for 3 months, feel free to reach out when it expires and I'll give some feedback then. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Just confirming that Clovermoss and I had a chat about this. Clover feels up to giving you a shot and I'm more than happy to trust their judgment. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Do you think maybe you should strike the not done? Our conflicting messages might confuse the bot? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Good thought. I've tweaked that reply. Hey man im josh (talk) 04:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@Clovermoss, @Hey man im josh, Interesting, he only took part in 6 AFDs and has just a thousand edits. He was given the New Page reviewer right, while I was rejected despite having more experience and engagement in AFD, CSD, and other areas. Even thought I requested for one month trial. 👍🏻 Grabup (talk) 04:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
I see that you're upset but snarky comments on other people's requests is not the most productive way to go about this. If you have an issue with an admin's action or lack thereof, it's usually best to talk to them about it on their talk page.
My faith in Blue Penguin relies on their editing outside the AfD and CSD areas, as I believe demonstrating competence in creating articles and participating in project space discussions shows that someone has a high likelihood of following instructions and not messing things up. Sometimes different admins look at situations differently - hence the term "admin discretion". Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 05:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@Clovermoss, He's only created 10 articles. Even if we exclude my village articles, my film articles surpass his in number. I won't comment further, but I don't think it's fair. Apologies for questioning. Grabup (talk) 05:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@Grabup: Admins are not infallible and you have every right to question. The issue is how and where you do it. As said though, this is not the place for that discussion. Hey man im josh (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@Grabup: Interesting, did you perhaps consider that there were other issues when you were reviewed? Possibly something like temperament? Possibly ignoring proper practices, such as not commenting on other user's requests at WP:PERM?
Different people make different decisions. Clovermoss asked if they could give this user a shot. If they want to, I'm not going to say no because I trust their judgement. It's that simple. Hey man im josh (talk) 05:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Vanderwaalforces

Put on a two-month trial by Hey man im josh, trial will end in the coming week and I will love to continue contributing at NPP. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 20:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Florificapis

I got busy in real life for most of March and April, so my request was put on hold per [1]. Here is my original reason for requesting NPR permissions again.

I have over 120 new articles under my belt, mostly relating to medieval history, monasteries, saints, and geographical features. I am familiar with the kinds of content that would fall under CSD criteria, since I have experience wikifying new pages and tagging obviously problematic new pages for speedy deletion. I know the guidelines on notability, proper sourcing, draftifying new articles, rating talk pages using scripts, AfC, AfD, and other essential patrolling tasks. Would be quite happy to reduce the backlog while being cautious and careful. Also currently a Pending Changes Reviewer. Florificapis (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 00:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:TheTechie

I am requesting this permission to help out with the backlog, as the notice came on my watchlist.

  1. I am extended confirmed and have been here for 3+ years, so I meet the account age/edit count requirements.
  2. I have never had any blocks.
  3. I agree to reviewing on a volunteer basis.

I would like to be able to use this permission, even if temporary, to help with the drive, as said above. If you reply here, please ping me. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:InDimensional

I would like to participate in the NPP backlog drive.

  • I have experience creating new pages as well as participating in AfD discussions.
  • Never had any blocks.
  • Agree to review on a trial basis. InDimensional (talk) 12:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Dudhhr

I'd like to volunteer for the NPP drive this month. I was previously granted the right for a trial period in August (expired a month later, extension request declined), and for another trial in December (for the January drive; unfortunately I was inactive as I was busy IRL). I have a bit of content writing experience (Trams in Olsztyn ) and formerly worked in AfC reviewing. – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 17:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:B3251

I would like to help out with the backlog. I’m very familiar with the content policies, having created 71 active articles (most being non-stubs) as of making this request. I’ve additionally had some experience in participating in discussions, handling deletion templates, and moving new articles with significant issues to the draft space. B3251 (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

User:LEvalyn

I'd like to join the backlog drive. I'm an AfC reviewer and a while back TechnoSquirrel suggested I try NPP. I'm finally tempted enough to try! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done for a 2-month trial. Thanks for volunteering, please re-apply roughly a week before the perm is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

User:TarnishedPath

I participated in the December backlog drive, being granted a trial. At the end of the trial I requested permanent NPP, which was denied with the denying admin expressing concern that I hadn't created any articles. I've since created an article about Neeraj Gupta (refer to User_talk:TarnishedPath/Archive_2#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Neeraj_Gupta_(sculptor)_has_been_accepted) and been responsible for the bulk of the material in the newly created article Bruce Lehrmann‎. I had been working on Draft:Bruce Lehrmann‎ but someone else started work on Bruce Lehrmann‎ just as I submitted Draft:Bruce Lehrmann‎ to AfC so I ended up merging my work over to the mainspace article and issuing a CSD for deletion of the draft. I've continued to be semi-regularly involved with AfD. I'm applying because I got a notification a while ago that there was a backlog drive for May and I'm willing to help out a bit with that. TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC) TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy ping to Rosguill, as they granted the trial perm. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Remsense

I would like to review more pages, having been granted the role temporarily before. Remsense诉 07:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Hey man im josh (talk) 12:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Kung Fu Man

Requesting page mover rights for my frequent work on video game character articles, many of which involve writing up an article on a userpage to later move to where a previous redirect may exist and working alongside other editors towards this end. Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:WiinterU

I would like to have page moving rights because of many company articles with incorrect article names with their correct names being the redirects. WiinterU 00:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Remsense

  1. I often move articles in a space (China and Chinese-related topics) where there are specific naming conventions that are uncontroversial moves, sometimes requiring #delete-redirect.
  2. I often move pages around in my userspace, and #suppress-redirect would perhaps clutter the U1 log less. Remsense诉 23:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Sunnyboi18

Hello, I'am applying again for Pending Changes Reviewer, as it was felt by a person who reviewed this that my request was "all over the place" and that "I didn't understand that PC rights are". I don't think that's fair.

I was simply just giving my experience and of having done 632 edits on Wiki involving mostly updating critical information, having been an Editor since Feburary 2021, and being familiar with Wiki Guidelines & Copyright and understanding the importance of making sure the info on Wiki is correct, and preventing Vandalism. And other requests saying that exact same stuff were approved, so not sure what to say but, I'am aware of the importance and privliege of this permission, and would like my request to be considered fairly, as it did not feel like that was the case the first time, based on the response that I got. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 14:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry you think my decline of your request was unfair, I did read it, and I gave my honest impression of it. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Well, you're "honest impression" was more of a commentary on me personally rather than my experience and work I've done. So once again, it does not seem like this is being processed in a fair and unbiased manner. Especially when requests have been approved with very little language in them with regard to their background or experience, or with the same amount of/less edits as myself. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm leaving this open for another, previously uninvolved admin to review, I was just explaining myself. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Allan Nonymous

I have a history of cleaning up grammar, removing and refactoring uncited content and fixing citations. I'm hoping to maybe expand my editing scope a bit. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:CanonNi

Hi. I recently got Rollback rights, so I thought it would be nice to have PCR rights as well. The main reason I would like this right is to further deal with vandalism, and accepting good edits. Although the pending changes backlog is not as high as... some other backlogs I could mention, I would still like to help with reviews. Thanks for considering my request! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done -Fastily 21:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Lynch44

I have been reverting vandalism as an account for about a month now, and have familiarized myself with Twinkle as well. Also note the 20,000 edits, mostly anti-vandal, that I made as an IP. Lynch44 (talk) 01:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
If you consider me not fit for rollback due to this, then I am more than willing to wait further if necessary, and I will try to be more efficient in warning others in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I've neither approved nor denied your request. But I would like to have a conversation on why you haven't been notifying editors after reverting their edits. Is it because... you didn't know you needed to, you've been acting too quickly without giving proper attention to each revert, etc? -Fastily 05:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Part of it was me assuming the edit was so minor that an edit summary would be sufficient (like the second diff), or, just not giving a warning or notice because I did not feel there was a specific one that could fit. Again, I will try to warn or notify all editors when reverting them in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Yes, please ensure that you are always leaving notifications. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 00:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Understood. Moving forward, I promise to notify all editors when I revert their edits, good faith or not. Lynch44 (talk) 01:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks for confirming,  Done -Fastily 21:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Wiiformii

Hello! For about the past month, I've been patrolling recent changes and have gotten to know Ultraviolet well as I consistently warn users who make unconstructive and bad-faith edits. I am requesting rollback rights to further enhance my patrolling by using tools such as AntiVandal which will speed up the process greatly and Huggle which is a helpful tool to have to combat vandalism. Rollback also makes my reverts faster and more efficient allowing me to respond faster and better. Wiiformii (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 00:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Hello, these edits were mistakes on my part, although the large majority of the rest of my reverts come with warnings using Ultraviolet (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Thank you for bringing it to my attention and I will make sure to appropriately warn users in the future. Wiiformii (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 21:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
I understand. I promise I will always leave warnings in good faith or not. Thank you for letting me know. Wiiformii (talk) 21:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Admin_dashboard&oldid=1191239147"