Talk:Zapad 2013

Military history: European / Polish / Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belarus Low‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 20:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

T-72 tanks during Zapad 2013

... that the Russian and Belarusian Zapad 2013 military exercise was officially described as counterterrorist, but international observers concluded it was a preparation for a conventional war? Source: https://jamestown.org/program/what-do-the-zapad-2013-exercises-reveal-part-one/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rhynchocyon

Created by Piotrus (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 508 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

PS. I forgot to mention - there are plenty of images available for this hook. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Zapad_2013

You'll want to add an image to this page for it to be considered for the nom. I can tell you that as written, that article would deserve {{lead too short}} and you should consider expanding it.--Laun chba ller 12:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer: I have expanded the lead. I am not sure how to add an image it post-nom. But I'd suggest File:Zapad-2013 strategic military exercises (2101-09).jpg. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By finding another nom that does it successfully and adapting it. I'll leave it to you to add a caption and will call for a reviewer.--Laun chba ller 15:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Caption: "T-72 tanks during Zapad 2013". --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added.--Laun chba ller 23:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

--evrik ^(talk) 14:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]