Talk:Tropical Depression Five-E (2008)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTropical Depression Five-E (2008) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Todo[edit]

Finish the MH! --Anhamirak 23:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cut down on the info about the wave. Remember, the wave was not the same as the tropical cyclone, it just spawned it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. But that's about half the article. Potapych (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, I removed three sentences that were a bit excessive in the article. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Depression Five-E (2008)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I made a few copy edits which you are free to revert if I changed the meaning. Everything looks good. There are just a few issues.

Comments
  • There are some dead links.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.003.shtml?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.004.shtml?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/ep05/ep052008.public.a.006.shtml?
  • What is "Hill of Ortega, Cabbage" as I have never heard of it?

Everything else looks good. Nicely written!

—Mattisse (Talk) 22:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "Hill of Ortega, Cabbage" was lost in translation. I also fixed those dead links. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

—Mattisse (Talk) 23:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks hink, I got the last reference then :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Netrual
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations. Good work!

—Mattisse (Talk) 00:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tropical_Depression_Five-E_(2008)&oldid=1211231306"