Talk:Treaty of Constantinople (1724)

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries: Ottoman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as Low-importance).

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The name is not the problem....[edit]

but the total lack of references. If you can give a book, journal article or other reliable source for the fact of the treaty, it doesn't matter all that much what you call it. But we DO need to have a reference that says it existed! --Alvestrand (talk) 17:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know, that's why I've been spending the last hour finding and formatting them. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most beautiful. Thanks! --Alvestrand (talk) 22:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Persian territories[edit]

Would it be more correct to clarify that these territories were formerly occupied by or were under influence of Persia, rather than Persian territories? These are Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia and they, by large, are/were not regarded as such. - Alsandro · T · w:ka: Th · T 16:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]