This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
A list of alternate spellings for this fortress follow. All ought to be made into redirects but probably do not belong in the lead. I will leave it to Choess or someone else knowledgeable about the Knights Templar to decide if I have made the right choice in creating the article under Trapessac: Darbı Sak, Darb-ı Sak, Darbsak, Darbsâk, Derbesak, Derbesâk, Trapessac, Trapesac, Terbezek. Aramgar (talk) 05:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think my expertise has been much overrated, although I'm flattered. From a quick scan of Google Books, it looks like "Darbsak" may be more common in English and "Trapessac" in French, but I'd rather let one of our professional historians weigh in. Moving over a redirect shouldn't be too difficult. Choess (talk) 02:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
