Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in New Zealand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mormon myths and miracles[edit]

I'm LDS so I'm not sure how neutral I am here, but the "It is said that Matthew Cowley..." thing seems a bit wierd. Why is it a myth and what is notable about his being assigned to translate LDS scriptures? Dakane2 (talk) 22:40, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The information was already in a previous section about the translation, so I removed it from the "myths and miracles" section. I also renamed the section. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:12, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in New Zealand's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "newsroom":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 10:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

“Indoctrinate”[edit]

I’m also LDS, but I do think it is very obviously biased that the word “indoctrinate” is used. I did change this, but it seems to have been reverted. I do not want to be involved in an edit war, so I did not change it again. If anyone thinks that the word is not biased, please let me know why. DORITO BOSS (talk) 00:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. This is a very biased word. VMDraper (talk) 01:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a proselytising religion. That's an entirely appropriate word.-gadfium 01:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One can be indoctrinated but not converted. Someone in the group might change a belief but not get baptized and indoctrinate covers all that are influenced by teachings. Influence might be a more suitable word to describe the situation, but I'm good with whatever the remaining consensus comes up with - as long as it's correctly defines the situation.-- Dmm1169 (talk) 07:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indoctrinate means "to teach false doctrine" There is an obvious bias. Influence is a better word. I'm going to change it if no one else will. VMDraper (talk) 14:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The word does not imply the doctrine is false. What dictionary are you using?-gadfium 17:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]