Talk:Tapestry/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
poor picture
This is a pathetic Tapestry article. It needs to be at least ten times longer and meatier. Please let's get a better lead photo, maybe a closeup of a famous historic tapestry that does not look so much like ordinary common embroidery etc as the modern couch pillow currently shown... And we need diagrams showing the details of tapestry weave stitch. 69.87.200.111 01:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Replaced the picture. - PKM 00:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Replaced the picture again. There are good illustrations of tapestry weaving in the commons, which we should add to this article, along with a discussion of the method of construction. - PKM 00:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well I add two pictures tapestry weaving and one of a loom some time ago. But more discussion of the method of construction is still needed - Doktor Faustus 2 July 2007
- "And we need diagrams showing the details of tapestry weave stitch." Yes! Definitely! -lifeform (talk) 03:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Incomplete Pointillism Reference
In the Jaquard section the article fails to mention that pointillism was a failure, but it helped lead to the development of four colour printing (CMYK). It's only fair if CRT RGB gets a mention that CMYK receives it as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.13.56.191 (talk) 05:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC)