A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on December 2020. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
The recent contributions by User:196.15.183.91 is all WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH, wikipedia editors are not allowed to write from their own knowledge. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, wikipedia editors can only report what is written in verifiable, reliable and independent (preferably secondary) WP:SOURCES, and we have to WP:Say where you got it, in other words we have to provide WP:CITATIONS that readers of the article can refer to. Please improve all the content you have added, by removing WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH and by providing WP:CITATIONS for what remains. Wayne Jayes (talk) 11:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's also written in unacceptable "direct speech" style "when you enter" "you see the" as well as a lot of peacockery. I'm very tempted to delete the whole section, but will defer to other opinions. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]