Talk:Shirt (song)
Shirt (song) is currently a Songs good article nominee. Nominated by PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) at 09:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shirt (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Shirt (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: PSA (talk · contribs) 09:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 15:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Hi, @PSA! I'll be reviewing this article at the end of the month, I guess. I know I'm leaving too many articles waiting, but I don't like seeing so many GANs without review page. Also, to take a risk and let go of my nerves. Best, Santi (talk) 15:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking this review, @Pollosito. Please take your time. I will return here in a week to remind you PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 00:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Santi pinging as a reminder PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 10:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
As the reviewer has gone on wikibreak, I have followed the steps at WP:GAN/I#N4a, and returned this nomination to the queue. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
@PSA: A thousand apologies for the delay. Without further ado, let's get started! Santi (talk) 02:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Media[edit]
- Only if you consider it necessary can you put images in the article. I suggest because I find it a bit tiring to read a long article with little multimedia content. Santi (talk) 03:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Background[edit]
- "many forthcoming videos would feature the same creative decision" In that context according to source, I guess it's better "tradition". Santi (talk) 02:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. this feels like personal preference; I associate "tradition" often with something cultural, which does not fit here.
SZA had posted on Twitter two months prior to say that she was fine with having "Shirt" as a title, and she eventually picked it as the song's official name.
With the first I don't have problem, but the second needs to be verified better, in my opinion. Santi (talk) 02:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)- does it though? i mean considering we're looking at an article called "shirt", the second part is already an implicit fact. PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 03:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. I will agree with that point. Sometimes I get to be super literal and come to very strange conclusions like in this case, a thousand apologies. So this section is passed. Santi (talk) 03:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- does it though? i mean considering we're looking at an article called "shirt", the second part is already an implicit fact. PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 03:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Music and production[edit]
- According to what I understand in the source, trap corresponds to "Blind", not "Shirt", or there is something I don't understand here. Santi (talk) 03:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
'Blind' traded in the 808s and trap flare for a bare-bones composition with a simple acoustic guitar accompanying her haunting voice.
"traded...for" here means that the "trap flare" was "replaced with" an acoustic guitar backing . PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 03:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
when COVID-19 was announced as a pandemic in March 2020.
According to ref 34 (in fact, reuse it in this sentence), it's "before". Santi (talk) 18:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)- Kept. Darkchild says in the podcast episode: "
Literally, the first...I think our session was like the first day of the announcement of the pandemic, actually. Just started that day, and SZA was pretty freaked out...'Shirt' was actually probably the first or second song that we did together that same day in 2020.
" COVID-19 was announced as a pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020, whereas SZA tweeted that she was with Darkchild on 13 March.
- Kept. Darkchild says in the podcast episode: "
- Regarding ref 33, I can't find any clear reference to what the article says in its written part, so I'll assume it's in the attached podcast episode, which I didn't manage to fully listen to due to time. Santi (talk) 18:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you go to the archive link and skip to around the 06:00 mark, you'll hear Darkchild talk about "Shirt", which is pretty much all the stuff that is said about the song on the episode. PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 01:41, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Lyrics[edit]
Release[edit]
- Refs 49—54; 56—58: archiving, authorship and linking website/magazine/work missing. Regarding 53, the magazine Consequence isn't mentioned. Santi (talk) 00:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Accolades[edit]
- I'm surprised the song only had those two nominations from a single ceremony; interesting. I would suggest that you change the ref to one that announces both nominees and winners in one place, because with ref 62, the only thing you would be saying in my opinion is that they are still pending. Santi (talk) 00:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'll be honest. I don't like the style of the board at all; To me it looks very old. However, based on your previous approved GAs and other articles and lists with such status, I will pass by. I will suffer a little, but I will recognize that it is also valid. Santi (talk) 00:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- C-Class song articles
- C-Class Women in music articles
- Low-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles
- C-Class R&B and Soul Music articles
- Mid-importance R&B and Soul Music articles
- WikiProject R&B and Soul Music articles
- C-Class SZA articles
- High-importance SZA articles
- WikiProject SZA articles