Talk:Roche-Guillaume

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photo[edit]

I miss some photo of this stronghold...:-( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emír Balduin Hallef Omar Ali al-Adid bin Abú Sharee al-Kerak (talkcontribs) 12:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Location[edit]

The article states at the beginning that the exact location of Roche-Guillaume is subject to debate yet later on makes mention of its ruins. Is the location known or not known? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.106.129 (talk) 02:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't work this out either: The "Characteristics" section describes the ruins of the place, but doesn't give a source. The link to the Forteresse D'Orient website doesn't list Roche Guillaume, and the coordinates given show a ruin above the city of Antakya (Antioch), which are (presumably) the fortress of Antioch itself. Does anybody know for sure? Moonraker12 (talk) 15:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Addendum:This map on Commons (File:Antiochia su Oronte.PNG) shows the coordinates to be the citadel of Antioch, while this (File:Forteresses templières.png) marks Roches Guillaume some way to the north, on the border of the Principality. Curiouser and curiouser... Moonraker12 (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]