Talk:Raynald of Châtillon/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 02:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Will review. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 02:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

No copyvio/dablink/external link issues. Fairly well-written, only a few comments: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:54, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

General

• I think the article should follow BE throughout. If you like I have a script to do this.
• We generally mention people by their surnames after they have been introduced. There seems to be some inconsistency on this in the article.

Lead

• Most historians have regarded Raynald...nearby Muslim states. Maybe this line in the lead could be more precise in what parties have supported him and who have opposed him.

Early years

• but Jean Richard demonstrated Raynald's kinship with the Lords of Donzy When exactly did this revelation come?
• Steven Runciman says that Raynald Sounds somewhat informal, "According to Steven..." would be better

Prince of Antioch

• Duplink: William of Tyre

Family

• Constance was born in 1128. She succeeded her father in Antioch in 1130 Short sentences, can be combined

Lord of Oultrejordain

• Subheadings would be helpful.
• Duplink: Bohemond III of Antioch

Legacy

• Peter of Blois dedicated a book (entitled Passion of Prince Raynald of Antioch) to him When was it published?

Images

• I would suggest similar modifications to the captions as in Constance of Antioch. Nothing mandatory, though.

Sainsf, thank you for your comprehensive review. I hope I could properly modify the article. Sorry, I do not understand the expression "BE" in the first sentence. Borsoka (talk) 01:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

BE=British English. Not a necessity for GA, but it is preferable to follow a style. Presently, I will be promoting this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 10:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)