Talk:Presidential Library (Turkey)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:786wave, why did you revert my edit? MOS:MUHAMMAD instructs us to use simply "Muhammad", not "Prophet Muhammad". Similarly, MOS:ISLAM indicates "Quran", not "Holy Quran". Neutron Jack (talk) 02:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because as mentioned in MOS, it’s not the final say and is an ongoing discussion. Moreover, the users who wrote most of these instructions have malignity and are not neutral. I believe including descriptive words add meaning. In addition, that is what hey are known as and referred to by people who use them on a daily basis. An honorific would be words such as The Noble Quran or The Most Beloved Prophet. 786wave (talk) 02:22, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get hung up on the word "honorific". Specifically, MOS:ISLAM says to use "Muhammad", instead of "Prophet Muhammad", and "Quran" instead of "Holy Quran". I agree that it is possible for extenuating circumstances to occur. If that is the case here, what are they? I don't care about possible malignity of the writer--that is not relevant. Neutron Jack (talk) 02:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you like. However, Muhammad is known as Prophet Muhammad, since he’s a prophet. Perhaps we should change MOS:ISLAM accordingly. 786wave (talk) 11:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]