Talk:Portable mihrab from the Mashhad of Sayyida Ruqayya

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Egypt

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Proposed Changes[edit]

I just wanted to add a section where we can discuss and jot down some notes on the proposed changes Brandnewgummybear (talk) 02:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(1***): I think the caption looks good---the only thing I can see us adding would be a mention of how intricate the carvings are cause Holley mentioned that was a bit unusual for wood as a medium.

(2***): agreed!

(3***): I think the 2nd paragraph has a good detail about the symmetry if we can get a citation for that so I would add that into the first. Also the secondary pattern part as well. Maybe put those details into the first and that's our visual description?

(4***) I think the dissertation says this but I would assume it also could be found on the wikipedia article about the fatimids

(5***) Dissertation :)

(6***) not sure on that myself

(7***) that citation sounds okay to me! If you don't wanna say "conducting services" maybe you can just say "prayer" if you mean religious services?

(8***) I have the O'kane one! Brandnewgummybear (talk) 03:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General comment[edit]

Just a general comment to congratulate the creators on their great work here. I've made one or two adjustments, and I think there's a couple of other generally superficial things to reorganize or adjust for a more standard Wikipedia style, but this is a welcome addition. If there are any further questions about formatting or style questions that I can help with (or questions about any changes I make), feel free to ask. R Prazeres (talk) 19:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]