Talk:Political jurisprudence

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notwithstanding the use of language, I think this article is better classified under the rubric "sociology of law". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty2001 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is another important use of the term or phrase "political jurisprudence", which is quite different from the one by Shapiro that the article refers to. This is the definition used by Martin Loughlin in e.g. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/political-jurisprudence-9780198810223 --Trmdttr (talk) 09:35, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

History of Political Jurisprudence citation[edit]

The citation for the "History of Political Jurisprudence" section has been incorrect since the section was first written in Diff/892149263 and committed to this article in Diff/892887373. The author, GordonTonde (talk · contribs), isn't an active contributor to English Wikipedia anymore, so it's going to take some sleuthing to figure out the original reference, or find new references to support the claims of this paragraph. Daask (talk) 13:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]