Talk:Partition of Kosovo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possible inclusions[edit]

Obviously we need to find references to back everything up but here go my proposals.

  • The partition of Kosovo on ethnic lines aka a split at the Ibar river.
  • Autonomy for the Serbian Orthodox Holy sites.
  • Possible consequences of a partition of Kosovo.
  • Politicians who support/ oppose the partition of Kosovo.
  • The hypothetical partition of Kosovo as an end to the Kosovo-dispute.
  • De Jure and De Facto partition of Kosovo.

They're just a few ideas, what do we think? IJA (talk) 19:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great, IJA! I will try to find some sources, at first, and we will see to introduce sentences about those... Bravo, these are crucial subjects! --WhiteWriter speaks 19:28, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Serb propaganda[edit]

The article as the way it is being written seems like not A DESCRIPTION of the proposal of partition, but like a ADVERTISING FOR the proposal of partition.--201.81.224.11 (talk) 15:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, and I understand you have personal issues about the subject. The article is far too stub-y too be considered one (description) or the other (ad). You are free to expand with sourced material. Caps lock.--Zoupan 23:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo borders... and disruption?[edit]

This is what Wikipedia says about disruption:

“When one becomes frustrated with the way a policy or guideline is being applied, it may be tempting to try to discredit the rule or interpretation thereof by, in one's view, applying it consistently. Sometimes, this is done simply to prove a point in a local dispute. In other cases, one might try to enforce a rule in a generally unpopular way, with the aim of getting it changed.”

I do not think that to include the information that the Republic of Kosovo claims the same borders of the SAP Kosovo of Yugoslavia is “disruptive” — in fact, it is an important piece of information about the bases of the conflict.--201.81.224.11 (talk) 15:11, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding SAP Kosovo is unneeded, firstly, that article doesn't offer any information to anyone wanting to know the surroundings of the Kosovo issue, and Kosovo is already the topic (geo-y they are the same), and you should note that the intro that I put forward has wikilinks to all important articles (Kosovo status process, North Kosovo, 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence). Thank you.--Zoupan 22:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]