Talk:Parshvanatha/GA2

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 14:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Opening statement[edit]

In reviews I conduct, I may make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use Done, Fixed, Added, Not done, Doing..., or Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. —♠Vami _IV†♠ 14:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Capankajsmilyo: Hello? You there? I started reviewing this article 11 days ago, and I'm wondering if you missed the automated bot message informing you. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 11:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vami IV:. I did miss the bot message. Thanks for starting the GA review. Will fix all your points soon. Capankajsmilyo^{(Talk | Infobox assistance)} 18:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

There should be a link to Dharma in Jainism in the text (ford-makers or propagators of dharma)
He was the earliest exponent of Karma philosophy in the recorded history. Which recorded history?
[...] whereas historians point that he [...] Point out?
Digambaras disagree with Śvētāmbara interpretations. Redundant, remove.

Done Capankajsmilyo^{(Talk | Infobox assistance)} 00:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Style[edit]

There are instances of both "BC" and "BCE".

Done Capankajsmilyo^{(Talk | Infobox assistance)} 00:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jain biography[edit]

There are terms and pieces of information in this section that, as a Westerner with little grasp on Indian religion, escape me with just the article alone. Ideally, the article prose would introduce or explain these; examples of this would be the tirthankaras, which are explained, but in parentheses (replace these with a comma; it is best to use parentheses sparingly and for notes like these, which provide small details). Others, like what Indras are, are not explained.

@Capankajsmilyo: –♠Vami _IV†♠ 00:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Colossal statues[edit]

Expand this section. There are six sentences - one without citation - in this section, none of which detail why or how Jains build these statues, or trace their creation through history.

Hi Capankajsmilyo, Citation is added for the sentence with missing citation. Pratyk321

GA progress[edit]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Status query[edit]

Vami IV, Capankajsmilyo, it has been over a month since anything was posted to this page or to the article. Where does this nomination stand, and will there be any progress soon? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.