Talk:Melih Gökçek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biased[edit]

This article and its sources are obviously biased and one-sided. It needs significant improvement in order to meet the standards of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.169.129.85 (talk) 11:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an informative entry, only anti-Melih Gökçek propaganda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.163.196.158 (talk) 22:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Many of the sources used in this article are legitimate, neutral newspapers of Turkey (Hurriyet, Milliyet, Radikal, Zaman, Aksam), thus I think labeling the article as propaganda is an unseasoned idea, as almost everything is backed with a newspaper article.

If anything positive can be mentioned about Mr. Gokcek referencing the "standard" Turkish press, it should of course be included in this article. However the last time an opposing edit was made, the reference was a local newspaper which is funded by Mr. Gokcek's municipality, therefore definitely not neutral. --Darius2 (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Remember, the columns appeared in Hürriyet, and the statements by Turkish Chamber of Architects, Turkish Chamber of Civil Engineers, the civilian Ankara Platform, and METU cannot be used as neutral sources because of their long-standing political-ideological strife with Melih Gökçek. Besides, the content of the article does not reflect Gökçek's 15-year office as mayor. It only talks about controversies between him and the abovementioned interest groups (78.169.148.156 (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)).[reply]


Some people here suggest that it is not biased. How come that there is a section called "Criticism"? If you go to other profiles such as e.g. Rudolph Guliani there is not such a section. Also there is a reference to a dubious report about the Kızılırmak project where the faculty of Middle East Technical University's Department of Environmental Engineering tested the water and concluded that the samples contained toxins and were not suitable for drinking. If that's the case why was Ankara presented with the World Water Organization's (WWO) "Best Practice Award" with its "Kizilirmak River Project" on 08th April 2010. This is just one example why the references used in the "Criticism" section are very weak and openly biased. I therefore suggest that this section gets removed. 86.22.92.144 (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, apparantly there are people thinking that the article is biased. Please do consider the fact that Gokcek rules the capital nearly for 2 decades, and with no doubt, there were things happened both with positive and negative outcomes. I recommend those claim the article is biased up against Gokcek, to strengthen up the content of his practices and value adding projects for the city, rather than complaining and "critisining" the existing, multi-sourced and above all, 'referenced' views coming from different people/groups/institutions. The title of section might be changed, but; the content must be kept for sure. More story short, do not forget that Gokcek is a politician, please. Best, Umi1903 (talk) 09:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality issues[edit]

This article is just an anti Gökçek article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.156.67.30 (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC) But now all critism is removed. Why? Kavas (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kılıçdaroğlu who you said in this article "clarification needed" is Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu. General President of CHP.

@212.156.67.30 Prove the article sucks. Stop whinning, mate! Umi1903 (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for write in Turkish, but this is for easy understanding of several complainers; Kişisel olarak, Gökçek'in sevmediğim tarafları olsa da, Vikipedi'nin tarafsız bir yer olması gereği bu nefreti kusamıyorum. Ancak Gökçek'in twitter üzerinden halkın belli bir kesmi'ni aşağılaması sonradan değiştirebileceği yasalar bir yana, İnsan Hakları'nca suç kapsamı'na giriyor. Ayrıca Cyberbully (siber zorba) diye bir kavram'a da göz atmanızı, Gökçek'i sevin ya da sevmeyin, tavsiye ederim.
Nutshell: I can't write my hateful thoughts due to Wikipedia's neutrality, but Gökçek is becoming a Cyberbully. OnurT 23:32, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melih Gökçek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Melih Gökçek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melih Gökçek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Melih_Gökçek&oldid=1199816877"