Talk:Maryam Eslamdoust

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 02:50, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by ResonantDistortion (talk). Self-nominated at 16:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Maryam Eslamdoust; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • This is a review:
    • Nominated within seven days of creation
    • Article is ~2,500 characters
    • Rough scan of sources reveals no unreliable ones, Earwig checks out ("Violation Unlikely", 11.5%)
    • Article has minor issues that keep it from being presentable. "Eslamdoust born in Tehran, Iran" is not grammatical, and the judge's statement can be removed altogether. It would be best if the citations in the infobox are moved to the body.
    • Hooks are cited by a source that seems acceptable
    • Both hooks are interesting. Leaning towards the first one because it is more compact
    • No images in article, so no copyright problems there
    • QPQ unnecessary
    • No other issues
  • @ResonantDistortion Almost ready for DYK. Ping me when issues are resolved and I will be glad to provide a passing tick. Bremps... 02:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Bremps Thank you for the comprehensive review. Good spot on the grammar error - I have fixed, and also moved the citations from the infobox. Presentation issues should be resolved now. Note: I have removed the judges statement at your suggestion - however given the text of this local court ruling was sufficiently unusual to be commented on within a national newspaper then I am more inclined to include it. I would welcome your further thoughts on this? ResonantDistortion 22:41, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • From the original source, it appears that the incident was interesting (and humorous) but the judge's quote isn't too special. Good work on the article; I'll pass this nomination. Bremps... 00:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]