Talk:Major Stryker

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jack Marston (Red Dead) (3 participants)
Joshua Tomar (4 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (nom)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Nuketown (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Kenshi (Mortal Kombat) (nom)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Unreferenced?[edit]

I'm not sure why this article is marked as unreferenced. What reference does it need (as of now, considering the information it has) but the game itself? I thought that non-verifiable things needed referecing, not easily verifiable ones. And if there is something that needs a reference, it should be marked as such. Otherwise, I think the tag should be removed. Sega381 20:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're not making sense here. Non-verifiable things, by definition, can't be referenced, and therefore should not be included on Wikipedia. Verifiable things naturally should be referenced, and if they're "easily verifiable", then what's stopping you from putting up the sources? If the only reference needed were the subject itself, Wikipedia would have no reason to exist. See WP:Verifiability.--Martin IIIa (talk) 19:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia[edit]

I wonder is it worth mentioning that despite being released as freeware now, it still display a screen "this is not shareware"... 203.162.3.155 (talk) 03:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Source Code[edit]

Does anyone know if the source to this game is available somewhere? 66.183.59.173 (talk) 11:57, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]