Talk:Indo-Pacific languages

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indo-Pacific languages article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indonesia Mid‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Melanesia

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

What about the intense criticism this theory has received? It can't be omitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.6.163.234 (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is it omitted? The article is currently highly critical of the hypothesis, if brief. I do not see a single positive statement about it; the article is even more lacking in that. --JWB (talk) 06:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there[edit]

Why did you delete my comment ???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.147.147.207 (talk) 14:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion :[edit]

Just because i don't yet have an a account on this site that does't mean to discredit my opinions or finding , What i have posted could be very big eye opener .

This is censorship and this is Immoral and Shameful ノಠ_ಠノ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.147.147.207 (talk) 14:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Hey, so there is another proposed language family under the same name. What should be done about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tealyt (talk • contribs) 01:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tealyt: Can you give some more info here about the other proposed language family with the same name? As long we don't have a page about it, there's no need to disambiguate the title of this article. And whether we should have a page about the other proposal, rests on its notability. –Austronesier (talk) 14:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Austronesier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indo-European_languages#Hypothetical_ancestors look here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tealyt (talk • contribs) 19:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tealyt: Oh I see. It was inserted with this edit[1] without any supporting sources, and frankly, this looks like made-up stuff which we'd better remove, unless someone finds independent reliable sources about the "other Indo-Pacific". –Austronesier (talk) 21:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]