Talk:Diyarbekir vilayet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening heading[edit]

Please restore the article Iraqi Kurdistan, as the current REDIRECT to Kurdistan is not accurate, since the former only refers to the Kurdish areas of northern Iraq. Also the REDIRECT in the Kurdistan (disambiguation) is also wrong. It should be Kurdistan Region of Iraq or Iraqi Kurdistan. Also the name for the existing article Kurdish Autonomous Region isnot accurate since this name was only used during the former Ba'ath regime in the 70's and 80's. Such a term is not used in Iraq anymore. Here is the reference to the name of the region in the new constitution of Iraq:

CHAPTER ONE: REGIONS

Article 113:

First: This Constitution shall approbate the region of Kurdistan and its existing regional and federal authorities, at the time this constitution comes into force.

Article 137:

Legislation enacted in the region of Kurdistan since 1992 shall remain in force, and decisions issued by the government of the region of Kurdistan - including court decisions and agreements - shall be considered valid unless it is amended or annulled pursuant to the laws of the region of Kurdistan by the competent entity in the region, provided that they do not contradict with the constitution.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/12/AR2005101201450.html Heja Helweda 23:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1515[edit]

according to the list Subdivisions of the Ottoman Empire Diyarbekir_Province,_Ottoman_Empire was created 1515. This was the time of Selim_I It could have been the Battle of Chaldiran James Michael DuPont (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

--LK (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Deryck C. 08:44, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move[edit]

Diyâr-ı Bekr VilayetDiyarbekir Vilayet – Diyarbekir seems to be the most common form judging from the results above.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I prefer Vilayet of Diyarbekir (In early republican era, Diyarbakır Province was called Diyarbekir Vilayeti ). But Diyarbekir Vilayet is also acceptable. Takabeg (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So do I, but I figured that moving the page to "vilayet of x" while there's still a discussion on the matter would have been controversial.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:38, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Adrianople Vilayet which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]