Talk:Delmar T. Spivey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I edited the Delmar T. Spivey page. Major General Spivey was not the highest ranking officer captured in Europe during world war II. Delmar Spivey was the Senior American Officer in Center Compound of Stalag Luft III. General Arthur Vanaman was the highest ranking officer captured in Europe during WWII. After his capture, General Vanaman was sent to Stalag Luft III, where he was the Senior American Officer in the entire camp.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Delmar T. Spivey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Delmar T. Spivey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Post-war relationship to Berger[edit]

Spivey left a bronze plaque on the gravestone of Berger thanking him for the kind treatment of Air Force POWs in WWII.

http://ww2gravestone.com/sites/default/files/uploads/berger.JPG

https://ww2gravestone.com/people/berger-gottlob/

The current section in relation to Berger sort of implies that having been exfiltrated to Switzerland bringing the message from Berger to US HQs it was a bit of a joke and he had his leg pulled. Seems though that his gratitude to Berger extended well beyond 1945. Berger really was a major criminal and Post-war Spivey certainly could have known that Berger was opportunistic in trying to instrumentalise him. I feel that as currently written it looks too much that Spivey wasnt duped. I dont know enough about Spivey but it would be interesting to contextualise this action of him with his postwar career possibly anti-bolshevist?--TrustyJules (talk) 15:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]