Talk:Data governance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

IBM[edit]

IBM is a private company need to removed from list — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.182.108 (talk) 10:54, September 3, 2011 (UTC)

Data governance vs. document control[edit]

How does data governance compare to the old corporate department of "document control"?

Many of the principles of document control seem to be common with data governance. Is data governance an evolution of document control?

Kreline (talk) 21:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Data ownership and accountability[edit]

Data Ownership and accountability (specifically at the exec level) needs to be added - as you can't govern what you don't own. Adrian Kearns (talk) 00:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why governance?[edit]

Why is this in a series on governance? Other than having the term in the title, it doesn't seem to be conceptually linked to the other pages in the series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.24.203.41 (talk) 00:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon.com book matches article text[edit]

A large part of this article is appears to be a copy/paste of copyrighted material. See p. 1 of the book Data Governance: High-impact Strategies - What You Need to Know: Definitions, Adoptions, Impact, ...

ISBN-10: 1743048122

ISBN-13: 978-1743048122

extract available here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.205.205.124 (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the "book" you link to is a collection of articles copied from Wikipedia. --Versa geek 06:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting proposal[edit]

I think that the distinction between a 'macro' definition of Data Governance and 'micro' definition would best be served by a content split and disambiguation, the two definitions are conceptually quite different. As a Data Management Professional who also has worked in public statistics, I would like to propose splitting the article into; Data Governance (Data Management) and Data Governance (Statistics).Duncnbiscuit (talk) 01:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]