Talk:Armistice of Belgrade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Armistice of Belgrade/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tomobe03! I'll be reviewing this and the other two articles due to the ongoing GAN backlog. I will start the review a bit later. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments[edit]

General[edit]

  • Remove unused parameters from the infobox.
  • Typo: "...and the Chechoslovak envoy..." → "...and the Czechoslovak envoy...
  • Rest of the text is well-written, no errors.

Images[edit]

  • All are alright.

Sources[edit]

  • All are alright.

On hold until these minor errors get fixed. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking at this. I've addressed the above issues.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]