Talk:Ahibaran

Ahibaran was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 21, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability???[edit]

I can hardly find any sources on the net which can provie ANY information related to the page. Unspokentruth (talk) 17:06, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 March 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved b uidhe 10:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahivarn → Ahibaran – The article Ahivarn is biography of legendary Indian king. but, the spelling is not correct. Right spelling of this article is Ahibaran, you can see that proof @Amar Ujala Newspaper Raaj Tilak (talk) 09:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC) --Raaj Tilak (talk) 09:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. b uidhe 20:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support (strongly) per nom. --CheatBeat (talk) 07:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Mandarax (talk) 18:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
GA status was set by a sockpuppet of the nominator. I'm surprised they didn't create another sock to do the DYK review. This nomination is definitely rejected.

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

[[File:|120px|Image of Emperor Ahibaran ]]

Image of Emperor Ahibaran

... that according to mythology, the city Baran, established by Emperor Ahibaran in ancient India, was the richest and famous at that time. He had laid the foundation of Baran Tower there? Asian Folklore Institute; Society for Asian Folklore; JSTOR (Organization); American Theological Library Association (1972). Asian folklore studies. Asian Folklore Institute. Retrieved 19 December 2011.

Improved to Good Article status by WikiGamee (talk). Self-nominated at 16:10, 13 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - The sentence starting, "The ancient ruins found at places ..." needs rewriting. It is too closely worded.

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - I don't see the hook in the article
Interesting:
Other problems: - Hook needs reworking, copyediting

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: --evrik ^(talk) 03:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Evrik: Please, see again the article. Problems that you point is now fixed. --Wiki 🎮 Play 09:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The article was reviewed by Bluue Bell who joined on 3 May 2020 (11 days ago). ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm rejecting this nomination. The original review was based on the status being "GA." Because of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raaj Tilak, the GA review has now been deleted. Please resubmit after this gets a genuine GA review. Thanks. --evrik ^(talk) 16:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Ahibaran.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]