Talk:2012 United States Senate election in Arizona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Flag of Phoenix, Arizona.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Flag of Phoenix, Arizona.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not running[edit]

The fact that someone is not running does not have any bearing on the historical status of the election. I don't understand how half these names even got on the list. Pierce is not even mentioned in his source. Nor is Pearce. The salmon source just says he's running for House, nothing about Senate. The same for Cherny and Crowe and Sinema. Mitchell's source is an endorsement, not a consideration. Shirley doesn't have a source! Many are sourced to a less than a sentence in one article. The fact that some idiot in the media can shout out the names of every prominent politician in the state does not make those people in any way relevant to the race whatsoever. The baseball player Gonzalez - someone asked, he said no. DuVal simply said no. HOW is this important? I left those who actually have full articles devoted them, but are people too stupid to know that if they're not listed, they're not running? So much of these are from sources a couple months after the last election, mentioning names in passing. Unless a person seriously considered running, a person was more than a passing idea that a writer churns out for the sake of making up names, they have no effect on the election, no historical contribution. And even then, that should be written in prose, not in an unnecessary list obvious to all - anyone who is not listed as running simply didn't run; it need not be pointed out. Reywas92Talk 16:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not decided yet[edit]

As of today, well over 300,000 ballots are still uncounted, far in excess of Flake's current lead, so it's premature to call Flake the winner. 24.214.230.66 (talk) 02:52, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United States Senate election in Arizona, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United States Senate election in Arizona, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]